if not it_vbak[] is initial.

[Former Member]

Hi Friends,

I get a small doubt using for all entries..

is IF NOT IT_VBAK[] IS INITIAL and

IF IT_VBAK[] IS NOT INITIAL. ARE SAME.?

I HOPE THE FIRST ONE IS CORRECT.

BUT THE SYSTEM WONT RAISE ANY ERROR WHEN USING THE SECOND ALSO.

THEN WHT IT WOULD MEAN FOR THE SECOND.

Guru.

[Former Member]

Hi,

Both are same

Reagrds,

Prashant

[former_member386202]

Hi,

Both are same

Reagrds,

Prashant

[Former Member]

Hi guru

You can declare in both way.

Regards

karthik

[former_member404244]

Hi,

U can use both...both are same only..

Regards,

nagaraj

[Former Member]

hi,

Mr.Gururam

see both the statements are correct but for the first one u r cheking true condition where as for the second one u r checking false condition i hope u got it if still u r problem not solved

i am here ro to u help u

my mailid [email protected]

if helpful plzzzzzzz reward points

[matt]

> hi,

>

> Mr.Gururam

> see both the statements are correct but for

> the first one u r cheking true condition where as for

> the second one u r checking false condition i hope u

> got it if still u r problem not solved

>

> i am here ro to u help u

> my mailid [email protected]

>

> if helpful plzzzzzzz reward points

Your answer is wrong. You didn't see the NOT in the first condition. The question is whether

IF <b>NOT</b> IT_VBAK[] IS INITIAL. is the same as IF IT_VBAK[] IS <b>NOT</b> INITIAL.

The second syntax was introduced later than the first. It is better to use IS NOT, as it is more readable. ( But the functionality is identical ).

matt

[Former Member]

HI,

both are same.u can do either way.

rgds,

bharat.

[Former Member]

Hi guru,

Both the statements are same ... but the difference is

IF NOT .....IS INITIAL is used previously ... but now we are using

IF .............IS NOT INITIAL ... since to provide readability and compared to first one it is the latest statement used by everyone.

[Former Member]

Both the statements serve the same purpose..