How Unit Test works on Open SQL?

[ArcherZhang]

Hi experts,

Say I want a DB handler class as below, in which method is pure Open SQL statement.

CLASS lcl_mara_db_handler IMPLEMETATION.

METHOD update_mara.

MODIFY mara FROM is_mara.

ENDMETHOD.

METHOD insert_mara.

INSERT.........

ENDMETHOD.

.......

ENDCLASS.

How can I write Unit Test first, as the decency is DB, do I need to consider that a different DB could return a different result? Or not necessary to consider the Unit Test on this leave?

BRs,

Archer

[ArcherZhang]

Nope. I'm not allowed to do so before 7.52 is available outside SAP.

But why not some teasing 😉

[retired_member]

For that, we have test seams and injections.

https://blogs.sap.com/2015/10/23/abap-news-for-750-test-seams-and-injections

Since you are with SAP, you might also check the 7.52 documentation for another new possibility.

[Sandra_Rossi]

hmm can you tell more about that ("another new possibility"), Horst? 😄

[retired_member]

Nope. I'm not allowed to do so before 7.52 is available outside SAP.

But why not some teasing 😉

[Sandra_Rossi]

oh yes please please 🙂

[retired_member]

Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood ...

The teasing already happened by mentioning 7.52 at all ...

[nomssi]

Hi Sandra,

how to enable (integration) testing with OpenSQL? I would presume the ABAP Unit framework will be enhanced to

• enable writing a fixture in the DB table
• run the tests
• delete the test data after LUW.

What do you think? Horst can vote me down to stop fake news 🙂

JNN

[fabianlupa]

I thought the test seam / injection thing was only a workaround to make legacy code testable without rewriting it.

In the example above I would have abstracted the functionality to an interface and implemented it twice, having a productive implementation that uses opensql and a (possibly local) test implementation with dummy data / return values (maybe even using cl_abap_testdouble). Is that not the recommended approach?

[pokrakam]

I would never have guessed that SAP would be working on another version 😉

[pokrakam]

One can "like" a comment, but one can only downvote an answer. One of the many peculiarities of the new SCN platform.

I like your thinking though, perhaps something like DB table overloading?

[retired_member]

Yeah, of course, but

[Sandra_Rossi]

You're probably right.

[nomssi]

Well horst.keller it is official now:

ABAP - Keyword Documentation → ABAP - Reference → Processing External Data → ABAP Database Accesses → Open SQL →Open SQL - System Classes → CL_OSQL_REPLACE - Replacement Service

I have found the class in Netweaver 7.51. Is it the same functionality?

JNN

[retired_member]

https://help.sap.com/http.svc/rc/abapdocu_752_index_htm/7.52/en-US/index.htm?file=abencl_osql_replac...

Point 11 under https://help.sap.com/http.svc/rc/abapdocu_752_index_htm/7.52/en-US/index.htm?file=abennews-752-open_...

So, officially available with 7.52.

[Sandra_Rossi]

OpenSQL gives the same result whatever the database is, that's the reason of being of OpenSQL (in answer to "do I need to consider that a different DB could return a different result?") I probably didn't get your point, sorry.

[former_member269539]

maybe you can 'select' again after 'ins/del/upd' of D, and then compare the ACT and EXP in your test method. to verify if the update openSQL actually works.