2005 Oct 13 2:00 PM
Hi all,
I have got many traced SQL stmts with timestamps. The stmts follow directly on each other. This means stmt1 is executed at 04:11:12pm and stmt2 is executed at 04:11:13 for example.
I have got approximately 60.000 thouand stmts that will be executed over a timeframe of one or two hours.
I think it does not make sense to read the stmts from a file in a loop. This takes too much time. Moreover the data, got back by executed stmts has to be stored in internal tables.
Reading the stmts from a file would take too much time. So the time-gap between the stmts would not be extended.
Do you think, I should just paste 60.000 stmts into an ABAP program?
How would you solve that problem?
thanks
If you are measure the overhead of the SQL statements and do not want any other factors, then I would say yes, you must have the SQL statements directly in the program.
Regards,
Rich Heilman
2005 Oct 13 2:08 PM
2005 Oct 13 3:37 PM
Well, you could upload the entire file and generate a report. (F1 on GENERATE.)
Rob
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |