2006 Aug 15 1:31 AM
Hi Gurus,
The structure CI_PLPO needs to be created for customer enhancements. I tried appending some fields into the structure, it doesnot give me any sytax errors, but doesnot get activated too. It gives me the message 'table ci_plpo could not be activated (e-structure ci_plpo is a part of a cycle). Please help me resolve this issue.
Regards,
Sathish.
2006 Aug 15 12:34 PM
First this structure it will be in partly active status. Then you activate the table.
Then activate the structure.
Regds
Manohar
First this structure it will be in partly active status. Then you activate the table.
Then activate the structure.
Regds
Manohar
2006 Aug 15 12:34 PM
First this structure it will be in partly active status. Then you activate the table.
Then activate the structure.
Regds
Manohar
2006 Aug 15 3:05 PM
Hi Manohar,
It doesnot work, I tried to activate the structure ci_plpo, it gives the same error message as above,then I tried activating the table plpo has the warning message "index plpo-pln completely contains the fields of index b", then when I try to activate the structure ci_plpo, it doesnot get activated, the same error message..
Regards,
Sukumar.
Message was edited by: sukumar kumar
2006 Aug 15 3:27 PM
Can you cut-paste the structure for ci_plpo...would give a better idea !!
2006 Aug 15 3:39 PM
This is the only row available in the structure ci_plpo.
component - ZZ_FIELD1
RT - checked
component type - plpo
Regards,
Sukumar.
2006 Aug 15 3:56 PM
RT- Checked is making a problem.
Enhancement to the table is dependent on the table clasification. Go to menu extras-enhancement category, here it says what fields can be enhanced to the table.
As in PLPO, it will not accept the deep structure as a new enhancement field. Hence you should not be able to add a field with RT checked.
Regds
Manohar
2006 Aug 15 5:46 PM
2006 Aug 15 6:29 PM
Actually I removed RT and entered a created a custom datatype and i get a few warnings but it was activated.
Thank you.
Regards,
Sukumar
2006 Aug 15 4:04 PM
Also you are refering the same table in your enhanced structure.
PLPO
-
>CI_PLPO
-
>PLPO
Hence you have got the message <b>" is a part of a cycle"</b>
I don't think it is possible, as its non-ending recursive
Regds
Manohar
2006 Aug 15 5:34 PM
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |