Community
Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

for iw61 bapi names bapi_alm_order_header_e , suitable or not?

Former Member

‎2007 Jun 29 10:58 AM

0 Likes
581

I am using iw61 for uploading the historical work orders. i found two bapi's are bapi_alm_order_header_e and bapi_po_update_history . are these bapi's needful or not for uploading the data? please anyone can reply soon..

I am using iw61 for uploading the historical work orders. i found two bapi's are bapi_alm_order_header_e and bapi_po_update_history . are these bapi's needful or not for uploading the data? please anyone can reply soon..

Reply
1 REPLY 1
Read only

Former Member

‎2007 Jun 29 11:03 AM

0 Likes
423

Hi,

try with the following which is suitable for iw61 t.code

BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN

FM PM_HW_HISORDER_POST instead of BAPI

PM_HW_ORDER_HIST' and make the custom version RFC enabled.

Regards