Community
Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

FM WFMC_MESSAGES_PROCESS not working while in update task

Former Member

‎2009 Apr 17 11:04 AM

0 Likes
1,650

Hi Experts,

I have an issue here where I have an output type is triggered upon the saving of a delivery document (via VL01n/02n/03n). The program (found in NAST) is used to assign another output type to that delivery via FM RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE_SINGLE and WFMC_MESSAGES_PROCESS to trigger its execution.

The 2nd output type is triggered if i use a program to execute the first output type (i.e. RSNAST00 and SD70AV2A) however it doesnt work for the normal transaction.

I have a feeling it has something to do with the fact that the FM is called in update task while using VL01n/02n/03n. Is my assumption correct? If so is there a way I can resolve this?

Regards

Hi Experts,

I have an issue here where I have an output type is triggered upon the saving of a delivery document (via VL01n/02n/03n). The program (found in NAST) is used to assign another output type to that delivery via FM RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE_SINGLE and WFMC_MESSAGES_PROCESS to trigger its execution.

The 2nd output type is triggered if i use a program to execute the first output type (i.e. RSNAST00 and SD70AV2A) however it doesnt work for the normal transaction.

I have a feeling it has something to do with the fact that the FM is called in update task while using VL01n/02n/03n. Is my assumption correct? If so is there a way I can resolve this?

Regards

Reply
2 REPLIES 2
Read only

Former Member

‎2009 Apr 17 11:08 AM

0 Likes
964

Your assumption looks right.

Read only

Former Member
In response to Former Member

‎2009 Apr 17 4:56 PM

0 Likes
964

THanks for the confirmation.

Is there a way to work around this?