Exceptions classes in 4.6C

[Former Member]

Hello SDNers,

as Uwe had already written in the thread .

What would be better?

1. Would you try to develop in 4.6C the exception classes
   (plenty of work, but keeping myself updated, and I can use them also in the future)

  CX_ROOT                             -> ZCX_ROOT; ZIF_MESSAGE
  CX_STATIC_CHECK (I need this slass) -> ZCX_STATIC_CHECK

2. just to solve the problem with traditionally

  METHOD get_xxx.

  ...
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
       ...
    ELSE.
        RAISE wrong_xxxx.
    ENDIF.

  ENDMETHOD.

With regards,

Peter

[Former Member]

You may appreciate that whatever is possible in OO ABAP is still possible in procedural ABAP with difference in the extent of SW reusability, visibility control etc. So its a design decision whether to go for OO ABAP. In case you have a business case for a class ( you feel that the class will be used many times in your project, you need to control visibility, you have chances of enhancing the functionality of the class, you do not want to incur more resources in testing etc. ), you can go for the development of the exception class.

Otherwise traditional development may be helpful.

[Former Member]

Hello Pyari,

I have decided in the moment for the traditional development, but also partly

with handling methods in special handling class.

Thanks for your answer.

Bye,

Peter

[Former Member]

I can not to award points to replies.

[Former Member]

I could not award points, now I understand why. See thread

.