Due to additional requirement i am using an idoc extension.
For that in WE82, i added standard Idoctype DEBMAS07 Message DEBMAS and extension DEBMASEXT ie i didnot use any Z message type but extended standard itself.Will it have any negative impact ?
Also defined this extended idoc in WE20.
I am further using BD12,where i see hardcoding DEBMAS to comply in selecting field output type. My current development meets my purpose as per BD12.I am able to successfully see custom segment along with standard.But if i use standard idoc with no extension ,then i obtain syntax error because userexits interrupts the overall process trying to add Z segment.
I thought of separating message type to Z.But then there is a lot more hierarchy to configure including change pointers and even if i do then that message type wont execute in BD12 as there is hardcoded validation to use only DEBMAS.
Though extending DEBMAS doesnot makes difference in standard functionality because it carries (standard + custom) so atleast standard remain intact.
If i bypass the userexit and configure nonextended normal DEBMAS in WE20 then standard idoc work fine.
Does that mean i can either use standard or extended idoc at one time and should i proceed with this view ?.
Bluesky
