Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Correct change document generated structure

Former Member
0 Likes
832

Hello Colleagues,

I have several tables one of which is called HFD_PHASES which has an include structure HFS_PHASES. I have used SCD0 to generate change documents to capture changes. The generated change document structure is HFS_HFD_PHASES. This structure has include structure as HFD_PHASES.

Recently, I made some field changes (deleted one field and added two new fields) to HFS_PHASES. Now, I get a syntax error in the change document structure HFS_HFD_PHASES saying the HFS_HFD_PHASES must be a flat structure. you cannot use internal tables, strings etc.

this error was not coming before the changes. Also, the other change document structures have the table as an include and they do not give this error.

Could you please help me here in how to fix this issue?

Thanks a lot, Vikram

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

former_member194669
Active Contributor
0 Likes
664

Please check from the top menu of se11 -> display> extras> enhancement category--> here "Not classified" needs to checked

and try

a®

Read only

0 Likes
664

thanks for the reply a®s. But, I cannot choose "Not Classified" ...the only option is "Can be enhanced (Deep)"..the other options are disabled. Should I re-generate my change document structure after the changes?

Read only

0 Likes
664

The structure HFD_PHASES not available in my system. so please regenerate the change document update modules and try

a®

Read only

0 Likes
664

thanks a®s...Is there a way to regenerate change document update modules for only the changed table i.e. HFD_PHASES?

Regeneration for the whole change document object looks a bit ugly in the development system since there will be multiple objects. In SCDO, I could not find an option to do this.

Thanks, Vikram