Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

concatenate

Former Member
0 Likes
565

Hi

I found like this

concatenate 'abc'(t1) 'def'(t2) into some variable..

t1is text element also has abc and t2 has def.

why he is using both?

can we remove 'abc' and 'def' and use only text elements?

Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
546

Hi RK,

The significance of addressing text symbols as '<textliteral>'(<idt>) is

if the text symbol <idt> exists in the text pool for the logon language, this is the same as using 'TEXT-<idt>'. Otherwise, the literal '<textliteral>' is used as the contents of the text symbol.

Award points if found useful.

Regards

Indrajit

Hi

I found like this

concatenate 'abc'(t1) 'def'(t2) into some variable..

t1is text element also has abc and t2 has def.

why he is using both?

can we remove 'abc' and 'def' and use only text elements?

Thanks

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
546

Hi

You can use

concatenate TXT-t1 TXt-t2 into v_str.

instead of the

concatenate 'abc'(t1) 'def'(t2) into some variable.

Reward points if useful

Regards

Anji

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
546

hi,

ss u can remove anyone , if abc & txt1 are the same

With Regards,

S.Barani

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
547

Hi RK,

The significance of addressing text symbols as '<textliteral>'(<idt>) is

if the text symbol <idt> exists in the text pool for the logon language, this is the same as using 'TEXT-<idt>'. Otherwise, the literal '<textliteral>' is used as the contents of the text symbol.

Award points if found useful.

Regards

Indrajit

Read only

former_member404244
Active Contributor
0 Likes
546

Hi,

remove t1 and t2...

concatenate 'abc' 'def' into some variable

Regards,

Nagaraj