Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE - New Items and Services Data

Former Member
0 Likes
1,065

Hi All,

My requirement is that I need to use BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE for the following requirements:

1. Adding of new Items

2. Services Related Data change for a particular Item

3. Header Text Change.

I am stuck up and not sure how to proceed.

Kindly Help.

Ankur Malhotra

Hi All,

My requirement is that I need to use BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE for the following requirements:

1. Adding of new Items

2. Services Related Data change for a particular Item

3. Header Text Change.

I am stuck up and not sure how to proceed.

Kindly Help.

Ankur Malhotra

3 REPLIES 3
Read only

mvoros
Active Contributor
0 Likes
865

Hi,

unfortunately you can not use this BAPI for first point. Here is a quote from BAPI documentation

You cannot add any new items. The method only supports the changing

of already existing items.

Point 2 should not be a problem. Just read BAPI documentation how to do it. Basically you should call BAPI_REQUISITION_GETDETAIL and fill structures with data from this BAPI. Then just modify required fields and call your BAPI.

I am not sure if you can change header text with this BAPI.

Cheers

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
865

Hi All,

I am still looking for answers:

1) If I need to: Add New Items, If this BAPI doesn't work, Is there any other BAPI which I can use?

2) Also how I can I change the Services Related Data for a particular Item, I find no particular parameter where I can pass this parameter.

3) Also what is the way if I want to achieve a : Header Text Change.

Thanks,

Ankur Malhotra

Read only

mvoros
Active Contributor
0 Likes
865

Hi,

have you checked BAPI BAPI_PR_CHANGE. This BAPI is a successor for BAPI BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE. It should have less limitation.

Cheers