Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

BAPI_NETWORK_COMP_ADD in 4.6c

samanta_limbrada
Explorer
0 Likes
687

Dear Experts,

I need to add component to network activity through BAPI. Unfortunately, my client uses 4.6c and it doesn't have BAPI_NETWORK_COMP_ADD. Does anyone know any other BAPI / function module in 4.6c to do this?

I have done my research but to no avail. Hopefully somebody has the answer.

Thanks in advance,

Sam

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
631

Hi Sam,

I don't think ther is another way or fm to do that.

But there must be a way to downgrade this BAPIs to 4.6C!

We have one 4.6C system with that BAPI, and there are some SAP notes (as 718843) with a 4.6C Correction Instruction (here: 614749) on the new Function Group CNIF-MAT.

You may contact SAP how to downgrade the BAPIs to 4.6c, but it is possible! They are running very fine there for years!

Regards,

Klaus

Dear Experts,

I need to add component to network activity through BAPI. Unfortunately, my client uses 4.6c and it doesn't have BAPI_NETWORK_COMP_ADD. Does anyone know any other BAPI / function module in 4.6c to do this?

I have done my research but to no avail. Hopefully somebody has the answer.

Thanks in advance,

Sam

2 REPLIES 2
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
632

Hi Sam,

I don't think ther is another way or fm to do that.

But there must be a way to downgrade this BAPIs to 4.6C!

We have one 4.6C system with that BAPI, and there are some SAP notes (as 718843) with a 4.6C Correction Instruction (here: 614749) on the new Function Group CNIF-MAT.

You may contact SAP how to downgrade the BAPIs to 4.6c, but it is possible! They are running very fine there for years!

Regards,

Klaus

Read only

0 Likes
631

Hi Klaus,

Thanks a lot! Will talk to the IT dept about the notes. It's either this or BDC and I think BDC is not really robust so I hope they can downgrade the function group.

Thanks again,

Sam