BADI - Workbench - ABAP and Functionals

[glauco]

Hi friends.

I have got a doubt. Until I know about BAdi's, it needs a workbench request and it was implemented only by ABAPs.

BUT now I'm encountering examples of TRM (FI), and Functional needs to implement a standard BADI. And he want to do that in customizing client/mandant even it asking for a kind workbench request.

Is that to be implemented in ABAP Developement mandant or in Customizing (Functional consuktant's client) ?

thanks.

Glauco

[Former Member]

Hi

The BADI is an ABAP object, so it should be always implemented in development system, the ABAP is client independent, so if your customizing is in the same instance of ABAP, it's the same: you can develop it in both clients, but you need to have developer user in both clients

Max

[glauco]

Hi Max.

Here, we have one client to each front. One client to functionals (customizing) and another to ABAP.

Then BADI we must have develop access key, right !?

I think functionals have this key gave by BASIS team and it isn't correct, if occurs.

My doubt is on why functionals can activate BADIs. Because TRM (FI) Functional here, have a training about TRM configuration in SAP and its SAP manual says to him own activate this standard implementation of BADI.

It seems such a wrong thing...because I've never heard about functionals activating BADIs.

So, we tryied to activate but obviously SAP asks for access key, to change standard in this wrong way of activating.

thanks.

Glauco

Edited by: Glauco Kubrusly on Dec 3, 2010 2:51 PM

[Former Member]

Uhm

Are you saying your functional can active/deactive a standard implementation without access key?

The BADI is an abap object, but probably not the activation

Max

[glauco]

Hi Max.

Functional said that lernt it wrong. It was a misunderstood. In his course of TRM, this BADI was already implemented when in training in class.

So, it's correct to say that we must create a Zimplementation, always.

Thanks.

Glauco