Authorization group

[Former Member]

Hi,

Can any one please list the steps to create custom authorization groups for programs.

Thanks.

[Former Member]

Check these outt

/message/4069535#4069535 [original link is broken]

[Former Member]

>

> Check these outt
> 
> /message/4069535#4069535 [original link is broken]
> 

Santosh,

Those links you provided are all wrong. They are wasting everyone's time about table authorization groups and not program authorization groups which is asked for here!!!!!!!!!!!

As long as you and other link-farmers carry on answering these types of questions with link-farms (and wrong answers, because you never even read the question properly - perhaps you looked no further than the Subject Title and then spammed away?

So... to make sure that you and anyone else who reads this (for example you colleague in the first thread you linked to, with whom you combined have more than 10 000 points) will remember these words, I am going to make a special little investigation into your points earned, dating back right to the beginning.

Okay... let's take a look see whether that works and what I can find...

Julius

PS: The answer to this question is in the documentation of report RSCSAUTH.

[Former Member]

Hi Oscar,

Go to SE54, Give the table name and choose authorization group and then click

on create/change. You can create an authorization group.

Regards,

Chandra Sekhar

[Former Member]

>

> Hi Oscar,
> 
> Go to SE54, Give the table name and choose authorization group and then click 
> on create/change. You can create an authorization group.
> 
> Regards,
> Chandra Sekhar

Chandra,

Please read the question again carefully (though even reading it un-carefully should be enough to understand it). Do not be mislead by Santosh's answer.... You have been added to the list.

Julius

[Former Member]

Hi,

Authorization group

Check this steps:

Regards

Adil

[Former Member]

>

> 
...

Syed,

Please tell me whether you actually read and understood that thread and what is going on there?

How does that relate to program authorization groups??? Infact, how does that thread make any sense at all to anyone who even knows that there might be such a thing as an authorization group out there somewhere?

What on earth were you thinking when you posted that?

Julius

PS: See my comments above to Santosh. You have been added to the list.

[Former Member]

Can any one please list the steps to create an authorization group for programs.

[Former Member]

You can get these details either from Basis or from functional consultant.

They are just the categorization of different programs. Any program which you develop and going to be moved in production should be assigned to customer production program.

[Former Member]

At the bottom of my first post is a "PS" with my answer in it => read the documentation on report RSCSAUTH.

If you want more infos, like for example why a warning message appears when you try to change the authorization group via the "Go to => Attributes" option in SE38, then let us know. It is an interesting and important warning!

Perhaps this can still become a thread where knowledge is shared, and not rubbish passed on again and again and again like some people do..

Speaking of which: I have already found one "points gamer". Take a guess who it is?

Cheers,

Julius

[Former Member]

>

> You can get these details either from Basis or from functional consultant.
> 
> They are just the categorization of different programs. Any program which you develop and going to be moved in production should be assigned to customer production program.

Venkat,

Who told you that? You have been added to the list (see above).

Julius

[Former Member]

>

>
> Speaking of which: I have already found one "points gamer". Take a guess who it is?
> 
> Cheers,
> Julius

I dont see no Guests yet...

pk

[Former Member]

>

> I dont see no Guests yet...
> 
> pk

What are you eyeing at, reduce the number of SDN participants???

Shoudlnt we be expecting to increase the awareness of "Rules of Engagement" and make SDN a better place??? I dont think being strict implies sacking off everything ignoring their past contributions based on one or two bad examples on a bad day which everyone of us can have.

~Eswar

[Former Member]

>

> What are you eyeing at, reduce the number of SDN participants??? 
> 
> Shoudlnt we be expecting to increase the awareness of "Rules of Engagement" and make SDN a better place??? I dont think being strict implies sacking off everything ignoring their past contributions based on one or two bad examples on a bad day which everyone of us can have.
> 
> ~Eswar

SDN dont need members who dont go by the book. There have been sufficient warnings by the Mods about the Rules of Engagement. There are sticky threads in every forum, and there have been constant warnings by the Mods with regards to this.

The stricter moderation began with "Editing" of posts and even after repeated warnings when the rougue posts kept coming, there was "Locking" of the threads. And yet, they kept coming. So as a final resort, there was the "Guestification". In my opinion its not that bad. It only means that the Member has reset his points table. What is he gonna do with that points either way?? Buy a Football Team?

If he's serious about helping fellow-SDNers he would play by the rules and make relevant postings. He wouldnt plagiarize other people's work and claim it as his own. Plagiarism is the biggest crime in the intellectual world.

Points-gaming is the cheapest thing one can do here in this forum. If that goes along with all the nonsense posts, SDN will be noise-free.

Have a Nice weekend.

Regards,

pk

[Former Member]

PK,

As this thread is not meant for our discussion/debate and to leave it just civil without taking it personal i would restrict myself from commenting anything w.r.t to your reply.

Happy weekend to you too

~Eswar

PS: Nobody is perfect. Neither me nor him(the creator). If he was perfect we all would have been same and we wouldnt have thought SDN is in a bad shape

[Former Member]

Eswar,

I did not intend it to be a personal attack on you. I was talking abt those who get themselves involved in the "forbidden things" here in SDN and was only justifying my frustration.

Nor have either of us left "civility" to the wind. So i guess its a perfectly decent and acceptable conversation/discussion.

Yes we do not live in Utopia. There will never be one. But atleast we can strive to make it a better place than what it is now.

Regards,

pk

[Former Member]

> I dont see no Guests yet...

It takes a while, because things are looked into in detail.

Sometimes, the more detail => the more Guests.

In this case, the term "Cluster of Guests" has been coined.

Cheers,

Julius