Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

address_subscreen badi

Former Member
0 Likes
940

hi everybody,

i wan't to put in not editable state the e-mail field of the vendor address in the me21 transaction.

i think i have to develop the address_subscreen badi, but when i try to activate the new implementation it says that there are already implementacions for these filter values.

if i go to the se80 i can see that there's a class called cl_def_im_address_subscreen that implements this badi.

Here is my doubt.

¿Do i have to modify the standard to develop this functionality?

Thanks

hi everybody,

i wan't to put in not editable state the e-mail field of the vendor address in the me21 transaction.

i think i have to develop the address_subscreen badi, but when i try to activate the new implementation it says that there are already implementacions for these filter values.

if i go to the se80 i can see that there's a class called cl_def_im_address_subscreen that implements this badi.

Here is my doubt.

¿Do i have to modify the standard to develop this functionality?

Thanks

2 REPLIES 2
Read only

Sandra_Rossi
Active Contributor
0 Likes
696

cl_def_im_address_subscreen is only a sap default class that you can use for creating your own implementation. If you want to see the existing implementations, transaction SE18, enter Classic BAdI ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN and click menu enhancement implementation, overview. Check if the existing implementation corresponds to a custom implementation (then you can modify it), or to a sap or partner product (then you can't modify it, or you can use the enhancement framework to enhance it).

Read only

0 Likes
696

Hi Sandra,

I've donw what you said and there are two implementations which are FM_ADDRESS_SUB_VENDOR and

FM_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN. these are not custom implementations.

Thanks!!