Hi experts,I am sending an in-process quality inspection along with the Production Order from ERP to DM. I'm getting the following error in the "Inspection Results Recording" integration message-I am unable to debug what additional "user fields" are ...
Hi experts,I am trying to call an OData API in SAP DM. I have followed Create an API Service (RESTful and OData) | SAP Help Portal, Manage Web Servers | SAP Help Portal and Configure Client Proxy for Third-Party Service | SAP Help Portal blogs to do ...
Hi experts, We attended the SAP Sapphire event virtually and came across the session “SCM100 | Explore the road map for SAP Digital Manufacturing”. We are also targeting the GxP industries and were concerned about the auditing and regulations. In th...
Hi experts,I am facing an issue with a part of the request payload missing - " <ns2:serialNumber>17</ns2:serialNumber> " for the transaction " Production Order Yield Confirmation ", due to which this transaction is failing in the scenario explained b...
Hi experts,I have been developing plugins, setting up data, and configuring our DM tenant in the dev environment. If I have a requirement to transport the configs and setup to quality and prod systems how can we achieve this? I have been through the ...
Hi @ManoelCosta,Yes, the http://{host}:{port} we are using is correct and accessible. We have cross-checked the destination details in Business Settings of DM, and also with the Basis team. The destination setup seems to be right and working. The API...
Hi @ManoelCosta. No I'm running Prod Orders in WC PODs itself only. I'm able to use the plugin and the feature in WC POD as well with limited functionality. It works for other materials which has same configs as of the MAT which gives the error menti...
Yes @matjazmoser I also came across this issue that you listed in the post but I have already resolved that issue. The issue mentioned in my current question is a separate one.
Yes. I'm using inspection points. I have configured 2 inspection points on 2 separate materials. Both configurations are similar to each other but for one it's not asking for any additional "missing user fields".
