Is there a way to set deletion flag to PM orders that were used as settlement receiver of a WBS element?
The WBS were already in DLFL status but are wondering why I cannot even set the DLFL status to the PM orders.
Hello everyone,
We are actually testing out some new business functions features and the follow up order was one of those. We are just wondering what is the main difference of it compared to sub-orders? Both have linking predecessor-successor relat...
Hi,
Our current configuration is that the during asset creation/change, an equipment is synced to be created/changed.
My testing is as follows:
Step 1. Created an Asset 1 with Equipment 1 (with Vendor Warranty)
Step 2. Transferred to a New As...
Hi,
This is about the releasing effect on projects.
Scenario:
Project was created using an "unreleased" standard project thus the message Standard (WBS Code) has not been released appears.
After the creation, the status of the object are a...
The error message is hard coded and standard. Is there a way to delete the settlement rules even if they are already used? As far as I know, it's not possible. Correct me if I'm wrong here.
Hi Terence,Equipment 1 (with vendor warranty and pass on warranty checked) is linked to Asset 1. When Asset 1 is transferred via ABUMN, it becomes Asset 2 and so does Equipment 2. But the warranty from Equipment 1 should also be transferred to Equipm...
Hi Ken,
Also to add, you might ask why network has RELR, the project was created using a standard template. During creation, we encountered this message.
Standard WBS XXXXX-XXX has not been released.
This is normal since we don't want to aut...
Hi Ken,
Included on this screenshot is the change document. REL status on Network was 25.01.2018 since they manually released it after we found out that it doesn't adopt the status of the upper objects.
Would you know what caused this?
...
