About DanielB

DanielB · 02-05-2024

Hi,we are upgrading from S/4HANA 1809 to 2023 at the moment. After having upgraded our dev system to S/4HANA 2023 we had executed the readiness check with the new check variant for 2023 (S4HANA_READINESS_2023 after uploading the latest simplification...

DanielB · 02-05-2024

Hi,we are upgrading from S/4HANA 1809 to 2023 at the moment. After having upgraded our dev system to S/4HANA 2023 we had executed the readiness check with the new check variant for 2023 (S4HANA_READINESS_2023 after uploading the latest simplification...

DanielB · 11-28-2022

Hello,we activated CWM in our system (S4CORE 103 SP5), but we've problems with pricing in deliveries.If an article is catch weight managed the price should be calculated based on the delivery quantity in the parallel unit of measure (i.e. "KG"), if t...

DanielB · 05-25-2022

Hello, if we try to do a remote comparision in version management of a object (i.e. a program), we get an error "no RFC authorization for function module RPY_PROGRAM_READ" in the source system and two dumps "RFC_NO_AUTHORITY" in the remote system (...

DanielB · 05-27-2020

Hello, what sense does it make to set the foreign key flag for screen/dynpro fields of type "Text"? I've just checked some SAP standard dynpros and found it for example in:SAPMV45A Screen 4303: "Text"-Fields VBAK-BUKRS_VF, VBAK-LANDTX, VBAK-STCEG...

DanielB · 12-19-2022

Hello,I opened an incident for this and got the following answer:Dear customer,we are very sorry to tell that pricing in delivery has never been developed for catch weight specific fields in Shipping tables. This is a missing functionality that has n...

DanielB · 05-25-2022

We like to keep it as simple as possible and to avoid additional support. If the user chooses remote comparision in the version management of an object and then click "fetch remote versions" two fields are shown:- "Target system" (radio button "Targe...

DanielB · 05-28-2020

Hello Sandra,I know the meaning of a foreign key check and I already had a look into the F1 help, but I wonder why setting a foreign key check on a label/text field, which can't be changed (it's just a output field and not an input field). You also h...

DanielB · 06-05-2019

Hi Randolf,we know the option 'Exclude buffered reads' and we've activated it already, but this option only helps, if the table of the second SELECT is buffered.Her an example (theoretical), where the ATC-Check should suppress the message, because th...

DanielB · 03-05-2019

Hi Bärbel,thanks for your answer. We're also using a central ATC-System on NW 7.52. We also defined a baseline, but we guess something went wrong with that. My colleague, who is responsible for the ATC system is checking it right now.

User Statistics

User Activity

Readiness check S/4HANA 2023 - Priority 1 messages for every access to catch weight specific fields

Readiness check S/4HANA 2023 and catch weight (note 2296016)

Pricing in delivery for catch weight managed materials

Remote comparision of object - Dump RFC_NO_AUTHORITY for user TMSADM in remote system

Screen/dynpro text fields with active foreign key flag

Re: Pricing in delivery for catch weight managed materials

Re: Remote comparision of object - Dump RFC_NO_AUTHORITY for user TMSADM in remote system

Re: Screen/dynpro text fields with active foreign key flag

Re: Some strange behavior/checks of ATC

Re: ATC - Filter for function module