Purpose of this DocumentThe purpose of this document is to explain the flags in the scope of check (transaction OVZ9) and to clarify which tables are read for each respective flag. It shall also give a brief logic behind each of the flags and the cod...
I am completely new to Web Dynpros. I am trying to complete SAP's NET310 course to get more knowledgable in this area.In one of the exercises, it gives the following steps:For both views ceate a form displaying a label and an input field for each con...
This is the requirement; We are launching a product in the future. Lets use August 19th as our launch date This means that on August 19th our material can be goods issued. It cannot be shipped before then. There is no loading time etc. so our GI date...
Arivazhagan S,
Consider this example. There is an available quantity = 10.
Sales Order 1 is created for a quantity of 10 and an availability check looks at the available quantity. It sees that there ia 10 available. Therefore, ATP will confirm t...
Hi Piers,
The document was written in 2014 (Pre S4). S4 brought in different ATP functionality (i.e. Advanced ATP) that is not considered in the above document.
Hi Sheetal,
S_ATPK is declared locally in form routines in function module STOCK_RECEIPT_ISSUE_READ. It is populated dynamically here from the relevant stck database table. Function STOCK_RECEIPT_ISSUE_READ is part of function pool SAPLATP2.
That note describes how to set up an ATP server - useful for performance reasons, but sometimes discrepancies can occur. I thought that might be the case here.
Actually, I think I mis-read your screenshot earlier - I assumed you had no requirement...
It certainly looks strange that the Cumulative ATP Quantity is zero in the above screenshot (as it looks like there are no requirements using the 294 in stock). Are you using the ATP server as described in note 99999?
