About pankaj_pabreja

pankaj_pabreja

Hi All, We are planning to perform the upgrade of our ECC system from ECC 6.0 EHP5 SP13 on Windows 2008/MSSQL 2008 to ECC 6.0 EHP8 SP11 (Latest stack) on Windows 2016/MSSQL 2016 . It will be done in 3 phases due to OS/DB limitations: 1. ECC EH...

pankaj_pabreja

Purpose The purpose of writing this blog is to provide screen by screen procedure of the sapjvm patch update using the SUM (Software Update Manager) tool. SAP has now replaced all the deployment tools for java based systems with one standard tool wh...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi Experts,There was a linux patching recently in our pre-prod environment after which one of the SRM ABAP system is unable to connect to the database. It is a distributed installation with 1 application server and separate database host. We just sto...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi All,We are getting the below dump while calling t-code SCUA after upgrading the BI system from NW 7.0 to NW 7.3 and doing the unicode conversion.Please adviseIMPORT_WRONG_END_POSCategory ABAP Programming ErrorRuntime Errors I...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi Gurus,We are doing the system copy on sandbox server from the production system and on the DB recovery step . We are doing the manual restore.OS: windows 2008, DB: MAXDB 7.8.2.31.Using netbackup tool for restore, we are triggering the restore from...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi there, I am doing the same configuration where BTP role collections are getting mapped to the groups claims and now I need to configure the mapping for SAC. Can you please suggest how did you make it work with SAC when groups claims are already be...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi there, I am doing the same configuration where BTP role collections are getting mapped to the groups claims and now I need to configure the mapping for SAC. Can you please suggest how did you make it work with SAC when groups claims are already be...

pankaj_pabreja

Implementation of SAP note 2576306 is recommended by SAP as it is a TCI note which contains consolidated correction instructions of SAP notes 2408073 2546220 and 2508268. The advantage of the TCI note 2576306 implementation is that you don't to have...

pankaj_pabreja

Hi Ruben, No, it should be either SAP TCI note 2576306 or 2408073 2546220 and 2508268. Have you already applied notes 2408073 2546220 and 2508268 in your system?

pankaj_pabreja

Hi Praveena, Nice blog, however I would suggest you to correct the below sections in your blog 2.1 Update to Support Package Manager (SPAM) version 69 or higher. Once the SNOTE is bootstrapped, any SAP Note containing TCI can be implemented in the...

User Statistics

User Activity

Release upgrade efforts - equivalent support packages

SAPJVM update procedure using SUM with Screenshots

SAP system not able to connect to oracle database after restart

Dump IMPORT_WRONG_END_POS after NW 7.3 upgrade and unicode conversion

MAxdb restore stuck with error "connect to pipe failed"

Re: SAC - SSO with IAS as Proxy for Azure AD - Role to Group Mapping

Re: SAC - SSO with IAS as Proxy for Azure AD - Role to Group Mapping

Re: Enable Note Assistant to Support Digitally Signed SAP Notes

Re: Enable Note Assistant to Support Digitally Signed SAP Notes

Re: Step by Step guide on SAP Support Backbone Update and Enabling Note Assistant for Digitally Signed SAP Notes