‎2007 Mar 19 8:36 AM
I want to apply a validation check on the section code field, which appears on the
first screen on transaction -FB60
Program name - SAPMF05A
Screen number- 1100.
Have tried using a field exit, but does not help.
Kindly suggest any userexit or any other method .
Thanks in advance
Sajimon Chandran
‎2007 Mar 19 8:40 AM
check tcode GGB0 validation for FI, i am not sure in this requirement.
Regards
Prabhu
‎2007 Mar 19 8:40 AM
check tcode GGB0 validation for FI, i am not sure in this requirement.
Regards
Prabhu
‎2007 Mar 19 10:14 AM
GGBO does not help, pls suggest a specific user exit or can i go about it with a field exit
‎2007 Mar 19 10:20 AM
try this BADI
FI_HEADER_SUB_1300
FBAS_CIN_MF05AFA0
FI_RES_ITEM_CURRENCY
FI_FB08_SUBST_BUDAT
if these does not work go for field exits...
regards
shiba dutta
‎2007 Mar 19 12:17 PM
Have still not worked with BADi's, so trying it out.
got the access key for FBAS_CIN_MF05AFA0.
Have created an implementation of the BADI.
need to find a link between the BADI and the transaction now.
do u have any sample BADI code.
‎2007 Mar 19 10:26 AM
Hi,
It is better to use a field exit for Validation of the fields.
Execute the program RSMODPRF by entering the dataelement of that field and generate the fun module and use.
reward if useful,
regards,
Anji
‎2007 Mar 19 10:47 AM
As already mentioned, i have already created a field exit, but its not getting called,
wats tcode for checking whether fields exit parameter has been activated at system level.
‎2007 Mar 19 10:59 AM
again run RSMODPRF but dont give any thing in selection screen it will display a list there you search for your data element. just check there it is activated or not and you have assigned the correct prog name and screen no or not if every thing is ok,...
then check in RZ10 tcode in your user profile settings abap/fieldexits = yes parameter is set or not...
regards
shiba dutta
‎2007 Mar 19 12:11 PM
Dear Shiba,
Have gone thru all the steps u mentioned, but still there is no solution.
am trying to find a BADI for the same.
thanks anyways
regards
sajimon chandran