2006 Sep 13 8:10 AM
All,
I am trying to implement note 765494, but I have troubles implementing it.
The note tells me to do the following:
<b>12. Extend the private section of the CL_PO_ITEM_HANDLE_MM class to include the PO_EKPVX_HASH_TABLE attribute with the following attributes:
a) Attribute: PO_EKPVX_HASH_TABLE
b) Level: Static Attribute
c) Visibility: Private
d) Description: Hashed X data for EKPV
e) Choose 'Direct Type Entry' to go to the definition of the Private Section. Maintain the following values:
...
TYPES:
BEGIN OF po_ekpvx_hash_entry,
item TYPE REF TO cl_po_item_handle_mm,
data TYPE mepo_ekpvx,
END OF po_ekpvx_hash_entry .
...
CLASS-DATA:
po_ekpvx_hash_table TYPE HASHED TABLE OF
po_ekpvx_hash_entry WITH UNIQUE KEY item .</b>
However, in the classbuilder the button with wich to jump to direct type entry is greyed out.
My question is how to maintain direct types in se24 for this class.
Thanks in advance
Bert
All,
I am trying to implement note 765494, but I have troubles implementing it.
The note tells me to do the following:
<b>12. Extend the private section of the CL_PO_ITEM_HANDLE_MM class to include the PO_EKPVX_HASH_TABLE attribute with the following attributes:
a) Attribute: PO_EKPVX_HASH_TABLE
b) Level: Static Attribute
c) Visibility: Private
d) Description: Hashed X data for EKPV
e) Choose 'Direct Type Entry' to go to the definition of the Private Section. Maintain the following values:
...
TYPES:
BEGIN OF po_ekpvx_hash_entry,
item TYPE REF TO cl_po_item_handle_mm,
data TYPE mepo_ekpvx,
END OF po_ekpvx_hash_entry .
...
CLASS-DATA:
po_ekpvx_hash_table TYPE HASHED TABLE OF
po_ekpvx_hash_entry WITH UNIQUE KEY item .</b>
However, in the classbuilder the button with wich to jump to direct type entry is greyed out.
My question is how to maintain direct types in se24 for this class.
Thanks in advance
Bert
2006 Nov 21 8:22 AM
Hi Bert,
I'm trying to implemet the note 765494 and I have the same problem as you.
Did you find any solution for this ?
Thanks in advance
/Rena
2006 Nov 21 8:30 AM
Obviously there is a problem with this note so you should get back to SAP about it.
2006 Nov 22 2:48 PM
Hi rena,
I did solve the problem by switching off the modification assistant.
I hpe this works for you too.
Regards,
Bert
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 3 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |