Transport system: errors on import

[Clemenss]

Hi,

we have a report program with 35 includes as our developing guideline require an own include for each FORM routine.

I made a couple of changes including the creation of new FORMs with new includes. Transport from develeopment to test without problems. After optimization I had finally 3 transports in Test system.

They were imported with STMS together into production. This caused a generation error in one of the transports because an include was reported missing that was in one of the other transports.

It was OK just to re-generate the program in productive system, now everything is fine. But additionally I had to update the navigation index and refresh the object tree in SE80 to see all objects.

But a bitter taste remains: I expected the transport system to be aware of all objects in all transports imported together.

Can you explain this behaviour and give any hints to vaoid this in the future.

TIA and regards,

Clemens Li

[Former Member]

I expected the transport system to be aware of all objects in all transports imported together<b>---->it will not check,dont do any syntax while importing the TP request , u have to make sure of all Transport request while doing it.</b>

Regards

Prabhu

[Clemenss]

???

Sorry, don't understand what you mean.

how to <b>do any syntax</b>?

<b>while doing</b> what?

Regards,

Clemens

[h_senden2]

What you can do is merge the 3 transport requests (which are already released). All objects in the 3 transports are transported all together. Now problems will arise

regards,

Hans

Please reward all helpful answers !!!!!

[Clemenss]

Thank you Hans,

so this means that transporting together and transporting in sequence is just the same?

Meanwhile I saw that already my first transport to test system had the error reporting a missing form routine although the routine was included in one of the transported includes.

Possibly a weakness in the system: The new Form has a similar name to an old existing form. The old name is 25 chars long, the new forms name is 29 chars long; old name + 4 chars suffix.

This may have confused the system.

Regards,

Clemens

[Clemenss]

thanks for all help - next time we know better.

Regards,

Clemens