Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Transparent table - Activation

Former Member
0 Likes
899

Hi,

I am creating transparent table, in which i am trying to put one field whose type is "table of strings", when i try to activate table is not activated.

also i tried to refer to a type( for the same field ) " table type of reference " which is also not working.

Please suggest. why this is not working.

Enhancement category of table is "can be enhanced(Deep)".

Thanks.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
667

You can't use any other table within table. You can use structures within table and only one table within structure.

Only one table can be used in the deep heirarchy, either this table can be at the parent level or at any level of the deep structures heirarchy.

Hope it will help You.

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
667

Hi Kranthi,

It is not possible to put a table type structure in a transparent table.

You can put structures into a table by using .INCLUDE in the field name and the name of the structure as data type. The structure can contain strings but not a table of strings.

And why should you. You can create another transparent table if you want to store more strings under the same key, like a header table and a table of items.

Regards,

Tom.

Read only

0 Likes
667

Hi Tom,

Thanks for the clarification, i guess even reference types are also not allowed as they are ( can ) have deep structures associcated.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
668

You can't use any other table within table. You can use structures within table and only one table within structure.

Only one table can be used in the deep heirarchy, either this table can be at the parent level or at any level of the deep structures heirarchy.

Hope it will help You.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
667

Hi Kranthi,

I agree with Tom , that we cannot put table within a table.

Thanks,

Vengalrao