Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Runtime Analysis of Remote Application Object

Former Member
0 Likes
713

Hi,

Is there a possibility of analyzing the runtime performance of a program which is available in a remote server ? Any options available in SE30 ?

Worthy answers would be rewarded..

Rgds

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
682

Hi,

No, the option is not available in se30.

regards,

madhu

Read only

0 Likes
682

Madhu,

Tnx for the reply, i know there is no option which is available on the surface, just wanted to accomplish the objective of testing a program in the prod. server from QS. How do i do it?/

Rgds

Read only

0 Likes
682

Hi!

If your program in QS is fast, than you need either more data or access to prod. Shouldn't be so difficult to understand, so that you should get at least one. Emphasis, that your program is fast in QS -> there is an essential difference in prod.

ST05 can show you already missing index access, have also a look, if you have read table without binary search (or sorted / hashed definition) for large internal tables - that you can do without mass data.

Regards,

Christian

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
682

Hi,

Tnx for that christian, i agree with ur thought on evaluating the program in QS Vs Prod. Further more, if you can really compare two diff. programs one on the current server and other from a remote server through a rfc dest. I'm trying to achieve a similar kind of scenaio where periodically i would like to measure the runtime eff. of my prog. in the prod. from the qs...i believe this should give u more insight into my issue...

Rgds

Read only

0 Likes
682

Hi,

write some stats (e.g. timestamp for various steps) into an own table and read this via RFC_READ_TABLE (FM).

Rgds

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
682

I did find a solution in ST05..Tnx for the threads.