Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Run time when using BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE

Former Member
0 Likes
891

Hi fellow ABAPers

I'm trying to add a schedule line for an item in an

existing Sales order using 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'.

It is working fine in my Development system, but

when i try in the Quality system (from SE37) it is

giving a run time error stating that

"The following syntax error occurred in program

'SAPLVBAK' in include 'LVBAK001' in line 156:

""DA_PAREX-VALUES" and "DA_BAPE_VBAP" are not

mutually convertible in a Unicode program . . . . ."

when i made a syntax check for SAPLVBAK in

development sytem there were no errors, but in

quality system it showed same error above.

We're using ECC6.0

why is this difference ,how to solve this.

Is there any SAP note to solve this ?

plz help.

Regards

Prabumanoharan

8 REPLIES 8
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
845

did you do verion compare on the program to see if there are any differences between Dev and QA

also did you transprot the append strcuture chanegs required to use EXTENSIONSIN to QA

check if these strcutures are same in Dev and QA

VBAPKOZ

VBAPKOZX

BAPE_VBAP

BAPE_VBAPX

Edited by: MxG on Oct 24, 2008 12:16 PM

Read only

0 Likes
845

Hi

The structure of BAPE_VBAP differs, No of fields in Dev is less than the no. of fields in Quality, what should i do now..

Thanks in advance

Regards

Prabumanoharan

Read only

0 Likes
845

just check the diff and push the transport as needed

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
845

Any help

Read only

0 Likes
845

Hi Prabu,

You need to find the root cause why this fields are less in Quality server. There may be some Transport request which has not yet moved in the TST as a result the error is coming. You need to talk to your Coordinator regarding this issue. He will identify why this transport has not yet moved to TST Server.

Thanks,

Chidanand

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
845

Hi all

Thanks for your answers,

but my doubt is both are structures with only difference in no. of fields , then why it is a syntax error ?

Regards

Prabumanoharan

Read only

0 Likes
845

any answers

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
845

This message was moderated.