RFC Transaction Call with batch Input

[Former Member]

Dear colleagues,

I created an RFC function module. I call this function module in R/3. Inside this function I call an APO transaction with batch input, because I have to start this transaction with special selection parameters:

...........

CALL TRANSACTION P_TCODE USING BDCDATA

MODE P_MODE

UPDATE P_UPDATE

MESSAGES INTO P_MESSTAB.

This works fine, the transaction is displayed. Unfortunately the transaction is started with the RFC user and not with the R/3 user. This means that user specific cutomizing from the R/3 user, e.g. display settings, are not used. Instead the RFC user settings are used. This is not requested by the customer.

Is there any way to call this transaction with the R/3 User. (of course is this R/3 user also created in the APO system).

Regards, Edgar

[Former Member]

Dear colleagues,

I created an RFC function module. I call this function module in R/3. Inside this function I call an APO transaction with batch input, because I have to start this transaction with special selection parameters:

...........

CALL TRANSACTION P_TCODE USING BDCDATA

MODE P_MODE

UPDATE P_UPDATE

MESSAGES INTO P_MESSTAB.

This works fine, the transaction is displayed. Unfortunately the transaction is started with the RFC user and not with the R/3 user. This means that user specific cutomizing from the R/3 user, e.g. display settings, are not used. Instead the RFC user settings are used. This is not requested by the customer.

Is there any way to call this transaction with the R/3 User. (of course is this R/3 user also created in the APO system).

Regards, Edgar

[RichHeilman]

<i>Is there any way to call this transaction with the R/3 User.</i>

I would say no. You can create a background job and assign the user to it, but you are calling a transaction and hence this will not work for you.

Regards,

Rich Heilman

[christian_wohlfahrt]

Hi Edgar!

With a fixed remote connection definition, you will always get this result.

But maybe you can work with trusted systems. Then you need a connection, where no user is defined. There was already a question, where login - even for a trusted system connection - was needed, but I hope there were configuration problems. Then I would expect, ever user (which exists in both systems) can open a connection without extra login.

Regards,

Christian

[Former Member]

@Christian:

Though you wrote your answer 5 months ago: perhaps you can remember the headline of the topic dealing with the question you mentioned (concerning the needed login for a trusted system connection)? I can't find it and I have that kind of problem too. Actually I don't think so, but perhaps I have mis-configured something. Maybe it would be helpful to read what was writetn then.

Best Regards,

Axel