‎2009 Sep 10 9:24 AM
TABLES: LFB1,BSIK.
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_BUKRS FOR BSIK-BUKRS,S_LIFNR FOR LFB1-LIFNR.
TYPE-POOLS: RSDS, RSFS.
DATA: CALLBACK TYPE TABLE OF LDBCB,
CALLBACK_WA LIKE LINE OF CALLBACK.
DATA: SELTAB TYPE TABLE OF RSPARAMS,
SELTAB_WA LIKE LINE OF SELTAB.
DATA: TEXPR TYPE RSDS_TEXPR,
FSEL TYPE RSFS_FIELDS.
CALLBACK_WA-LDBNODE = 'LFB1'.
CALLBACK_WA-GET = 'X'.
CALLBACK_WA-GET_LATE = 'X'.
CALLBACK_WA-CB_PROG = SY-REPID.
CALLBACK_WA-CB_FORM = 'CALLBACK_LFB1'.
APPEND CALLBACK_WA TO CALLBACK.
CLEAR CALLBACK_WA.
CALLBACK_WA-LDBNODE = 'BSIK'.
CALLBACK_WA-GET = 'X'.
CALLBACK_WA-CB_PROG = SY-REPID.
CALLBACK_WA-CB_FORM = 'CALLBACK_BSIK'.
APPEND CALLBACK_WA TO CALLBACK.
SELTAB_WA-KIND = 'S'.
SELTAB_WA-SELNAME = 'KD_BUKRS'.
LOOP AT S_BUKRS.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING S_BUKRS TO SELTAB_WA.
APPEND SELTAB_WA TO SELTAB.
ENDLOOP.
SELTAB_WA-KIND = 'S'.
SELTAB_WA-SELNAME = 'KD_LIFNR'.
LOOP AT S_LIFNR.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING S_LIFNR TO SELTAB_WA.
APPEND SELTAB_WA TO SELTAB.
ENDLOOP.
CALL FUNCTION 'LDB_PROCESS'
EXPORTING
LDBNAME = 'KDF'
VARIANT = ' '
EXPRESSIONS = TEXPR
FIELD_SELECTION = FSEL
TABLES
CALLBACK = CALLBACK
SELECTIONS = SELTAB
EXCEPTIONS
LDB_NOT_REENTRANT = 1
LDB_INCORRECT = 2
LDB_ALREADY_RUNNING = 3
LDB_ERROR = 4
LDB_SELECTIONS_ERROR = 5
LDB_SELECTIONS_NOT_ACCEPTED = 6
VARIANT_NOT_EXISTENT = 7
VARIANT_OBSOLETE = 8
VARIANT_ERROR = 9
FREE_SELECTIONS_ERROR = 10
CALLBACK_NO_EVENT = 11
CALLBACK_NODE_DUPLICATE = 12
OTHERS = 13.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
WRITE: 'Exception with SY-SUBRC', SY-SUBRC.
ENDIF.
FORM CALLBACK_LFB1 USING NAME TYPE LDBN-LDBNODE
WA TYPE LFB1
EVT TYPE C
CHECK TYPE C.
CASE EVT.
WHEN 'G'.
WRITE: / WA-BUKRS, WA-LIFNR.
ULINE.
WHEN 'L'.
ULINE.
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM.
FORM CALLBACK_BSIK USING NAME TYPE LDBN-LDBNODE
WA TYPE BSIK
EVT TYPE C
CHECK TYPE C.
WRITE: / WA-BELNR.
ENDFORM.result:
ZFI_IF0005_NEW
2001 300000638
1900000006But when I run the following code:
REPORT ZFI_IF0005_NEW.
NODES: LFB1,BSIK.
GET LFB1.
WRITE: / LFB1-BUKRS,LFB1-LIFNR.
GET BSIK.
WRITE: / BSIK-BELNR.result:
ZFI_IF0005_NEW
2001 300000638
1900000006
1500000209
5100000072
1500000012
1900000005why the results are not same?
‎2009 Sep 10 9:32 AM