Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Pricing error: Access not made (initialized field).

Former Member
0 Likes
3,143

Dear All,

I had a request from the customer for changing the Excise duty for a particular chapter ID to 8%.

What I did was I created a new access sequence with country/control code/material for the existing condition type (ZEXC)

and activated the filed.

And now the problem is that I have both the tax rates in the item condition as mentioned in the below screen shot.

Kindly help.

Pranams,

Balaji.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
2,702

Hi Ramesh,

You should be able to achieve this using exclusion indicator in the access sequence itself, provided you organize all the AS with proper sequence - and if you need only 8% as your active record then 12% should not be determined at all but for this your 8% record should come before 12 % record,then based on the exclusion it will not check other records

Regards,

11 REPLIES 11
Read only

jpfriends79
Active Contributor
0 Likes
2,702

As per sequence maintained access in access sequence, the system is determining correct value for the condition from access 20. Further newly, added condition table in access 40 is working well and there is no issues like Access not made (initialized field). Which you are facing in access 10. So, why you are not getting access 40 value in sales doc, b'coz access 20 is active. If you are a SD Consultant, then you might be aware that access in access sequence are arranged in specific to general key combination. But, frankly, your access seems messy.

So, what is the issue in ZEXC? What is the result your are expecting?

Thanks, JP

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

Dear JP,

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, I accept. I'm new to SAP and I'm still in the learning stage.

Could you kindly help me clear the mess?

Yes, I need only 8% to be calculated in the pricing. And I do not want 12% calculation.

Thanks.

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

Can you post all the condition table assigned in your access sequence?

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

Dear JP,

Kindly find the below screen shot of the table.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
2,702

Dear Balaji

Do you want is to remove 12% which is visible in 40-ZEXC and you want only 8% 10-ZEXC is this your requirement or u want changes in access sequence. Can you please clear your issue.

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

Dear Asad,

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, I need to calculate only 8%, and want to remove 12%.

Thanks.

Read only

Lakshmipathi
SAP Champion
SAP Champion
0 Likes
2,702

I am not sure why you have gone for new access sequence when there is no need for that.  Also, you have not indicated in which tax procedure your client are into.  If they are into TAXINJ, you should change in J1ID.  On the other hand, if they are into TAXINN, then ideally, you should create a new condition record / tax code, with the same combination.

G. Lakshmipathi

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

They are into TAXINN procedure. That was the reason I created a new access sequence.

So, I should create a new condition record that is the only solution?

Isn't there any other possibility of making this one work?

Read only

Lakshmipathi
SAP Champion
SAP Champion
0 Likes
2,702

Moved from SAP ERP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD) to Internationalization and Unicode.  Please post all your CIN related queries here.

G. Lakshmipathi

Read only

0 Likes
2,702

Noted and will post them in future accordingly.

Sorry for the inappropriate post.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
2,703

Hi Ramesh,

You should be able to achieve this using exclusion indicator in the access sequence itself, provided you organize all the AS with proper sequence - and if you need only 8% as your active record then 12% should not be determined at all but for this your 8% record should come before 12 % record,then based on the exclusion it will not check other records

Regards,