Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

performance tunning

Former Member
0 Likes
488

hi,

In performance tunning

how wiil help "CHECK" instead of IF/ENDIF and "CASE" instead of IF/ENDIF

Thank you

ASHOK KUMAR

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Read only

seshatalpasai_madala
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Likes
468

Hi,

<b>Check in debug mode when you are using IF ENDIF if the condition is false in a LOOP ENDLOOP, you will still goto ENDLOOP statement and then back to LOOP. Where as when you use CHECK its again back to LOOP statement.</b>

CHECK is very usfeul when you want ALL THAT CODE BELOW THE CHECK statement to be executed only when the condition is correct.

So when you use CHECK it will come out of the current loop pass and continues with the next loop pass.

WHERE as IF is like next statements will be checked. or executed.

CHECK Is more useful but needs to be used carefully as it skips all the code after that.

Regards,

Sesh

3 REPLIES 3
Read only

seshatalpasai_madala
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Likes
469

Hi,

<b>Check in debug mode when you are using IF ENDIF if the condition is false in a LOOP ENDLOOP, you will still goto ENDLOOP statement and then back to LOOP. Where as when you use CHECK its again back to LOOP statement.</b>

CHECK is very usfeul when you want ALL THAT CODE BELOW THE CHECK statement to be executed only when the condition is correct.

So when you use CHECK it will come out of the current loop pass and continues with the next loop pass.

WHERE as IF is like next statements will be checked. or executed.

CHECK Is more useful but needs to be used carefully as it skips all the code after that.

Regards,

Sesh

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
468

Hi

instead of writing multiple IF/ENDIF it is better to write CASE...WHEN..ENDCASE.

Betetr not to use CHECK use if..

If it is one or two or three times it doesn't effect the performance much

say if there are some 30 if..endif statements it looks ackward and ugly to see so many if..endif..and performance also not so good

see the doc

1) Dont use nested select statements

2) If possible use for all entries in addition

3) In the where addition make sure you give all the primary key

4) Use Index for the selection criteria.

5) You can also use inner joins

6) You can try to put the data from the first select statement into an Itab and then in order to select the data from the second table use for all entries in.

7) Use the runtime analysis SE30 and SQL Trace (ST05) to identify the performance and also to identify where the load is heavy, so that you can change the code accordingly

https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5d0db4c9-0e01-0010-b68f-9b1...

ABAP performance depends upon various factors and in devicded in three parts:

1. Database

2. ABAP

3. System

Run Any program using SE30 (performance analys) to improve performance refer to tips and trics section of SE30, Always remember that ABAP perfirmance is improved when there is least load on Database.

u can get an interactive grap in SE30 regarding this with a file.

also if u find runtime of parts of codes then use :

Switch on RTA Dynamically within ABAP Code

*To turn runtim analysis on within ABAP code insert the following code

SET RUN TIME ANALYZER ON.

*To turn runtim analysis off within ABAP code insert the following code

SET RUN TIME ANALYZER OFF.

Always check the driver internal tables is not empty, while using FOR ALL ENTRIES

Avoid for all entries in JOINS

Try to avoid joins and use FOR ALL ENTRIES.

Try to restrict the joins to 1 level only ie only for tables

Avoid using Select *.

Avoid having multiple Selects from the same table in the same object.

Try to minimize the number of variables to save memory.

The sequence of fields in 'where clause' must be as per primary/secondary index ( if any)

Avoid creation of index as far as possible

Avoid operators like <>, > , < & like % in where clause conditions

Avoid select/select single statements in loops.

Try to use 'binary search' in READ internal table. Ensure table is sorted before using BINARY SEARCH.

Avoid using aggregate functions (SUM, MAX etc) in selects ( GROUP BY , HAVING,)

Avoid using ORDER BY in selects

Avoid Nested Selects

Avoid Nested Loops of Internal Tables

Try to use FIELD SYMBOLS.

Try to avoid into Corresponding Fields of

Avoid using Select Distinct, Use DELETE ADJACENT

Check the following Links

http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/performance.htm

http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAPABAPPerformanceTuning_PerformanceAnalysisTools.asp

check the below link

http://www.sap-img.com/abap/performance-tuning-for-data-selection-statement.htm

See the following link if it's any help:

http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAPABAPPerformanceTuning_PerformanceAnalysisTools.asp

Check also http://service.sap.com/performance

and

books like

http://www.sap-press.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H951

http://www.sap-press.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H973

http://www.sap-img.com/abap/more-than-100-abap-interview-faqs.htm

http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAPABAPPerformanceTuning_PerformanceAnalysisTools.asp

Performance tuning for Data Selection Statement

http://www.sap-img.com/abap/performance-tuning-for-data-selection-statement.htm

Debugger

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/617ca9e68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm

http://www.cba.nau.edu/haney-j/CIS497/Assignments/Debugging.doc

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/b3/d322540c3beb4ba53795784eebb680/frameset.htm

Run Time Analyser

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/617cafe68c11d2b2ab080009b43351/content.htm

SQL trace

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d1/801f7c454211d189710000e8322d00/content.htm

<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>

Regards

Anji

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
468

HI

IN THE PERFORMANCE POINT OF VIEW CHECK MUST NOT BE USED

IF AND ENDIF IS BETTER THAN CHECK

CASE IS BETTER THAN IF AND ENDIF

IN THE PERFORMANCE POINT OF VIEW

REWARD IF USEFUL

REGARDS

NARESH