-
Products and Technology
By Category
-
Groups
Activity Groups
Industry Groups
Influence and Feedback Groups
Interest Groups
Location Groups
Customer Only Groups
- Developers
- Partners
- Events
- Help Center
- Topic Pages
-
Explore SAP
Products
Learning and Support
-
- Products and Technology
- Groups
- Developers
- Partners
- Events
- Help Center
- Topic Pages
-
Explore SAP
- Explore SAP
-
Products
- Products
- SAP Business Suite
- Artificial Intelligence
- Business applications
- Data and analytics
- Technology Platform
- Financial Management
- Spend Management
- Supply Chain Management
- Human Capital Management
- Customer Experience
- SAP Business Network
- View products A-Z
- View industries
- Try SAP
- Partners
- Services
- Learning and Support
- About
- SAP Community
- Groups
- Interest Groups
- Application Development and Automation
- Discussions
- performance issues with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILAB...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
performance issues with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2011 Sep 02 3:30 PM
- SAP Managed Tags
- ABAP Development
Hello,
I have a Z program to check ATP which is working with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY....
As I am in the retail system we have performance issues with this bapi due the huge amount of articles in the system we need to calculate the ATP.
any way to improve the performance?
Thanks and best regards
L
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎2011 Sep 02 5:54 PM
- SAP Managed Tags
- ABAP Development
The BAPI appears to execute for only one plant/material, etc., at a time, so I would have to concentrate on making data retrieval and post-bapi processing as efficient as possible. In your trace output, how much of your overall time is consumed by the BAPI? How much by the other code? You might find improvements there...
Bluesky