Perform In RFC function Module

[Former Member]

Hi Experts,

Can we use perform statement inside the RFC function module.

I am working with 4.6b version.

I am not sure about the cause of error.

Earlier without perform it was working well.

Now I have written perform , it is giving me error.

What would be the cause of the error.

Thanks In Advance

Irfan Hussain

[Former Member]

Irfan,

You can very well use PERFORMs in Functions. Can you give the details of the error?

Regards,

Ravi

[Former Member]

Hi irfan,

what error you got and you can use Perfroms. but try to check what is the error. while creating the Perfrom it should ask you to create in some ****F0I , did you created in side that include or some where..

Regards

vijay

[Former Member]

Hi IRFAN HUSSAIN,

I notice that you are not marking your posts as question.

It is always good to reward your helpers.. coz they invest their time on it..

Thank you...

[Former Member]

Hi Irfan,

I didn't notice that, please mark your thread as question and Reward for helpful answers.

please read this..

Regards

Vijay

[Former Member]

Hi,

I am using the Import Parameters of the function module inside the perform select statement in where condition , that's where I am getting the problem. I hope so.

Regards,

Irfan Hussain

[Former Member]

Hi,

Maybe it is a changing parameter in the PERFROM that causes the error.

Try not to use the import parameters as parameters for your perform directly. Use a local variable instead and call the perform with that variable.

Regards,

Andreas

[Former Member]

Hi Andreas,

I am working with the same logic, Provided by you.

Thanks & Regards,

Irfna Hussain

[Former Member]

Hi,

what is the error, what it is saying. and are you sure of that.

try to use using parameter

  PERFORM MOVE_HEADER_IN  TABLES RETURN
                          <b>USING</b> SALESDOCUMENT
                                SALES_HEADER_IN.

Regards

vijay

[Former Member]

Hi Vijay ,

The error was due to usage of import parameters in the perform.Which has been corrected now.

Regards,

Irfan Hussain