Inbound IDoc SHPCON - Batch update issue

[Former Member]

Hi all,

I would like to use SHPCON.DELVRY03 idoc in order to update Outbound delivery document.

Scope is :

- picking

- good issue

- update batches

- update serial numbers

- update volume and weights

We met issue on update batches a soon as one document item already has batch information before receiving IDoc.

2 cases :

- no batch spliting => High level item has already a linked batch (LIPS-POSNR = 000010 and LIPS-CHARG not empty.

Is there a way to update batch information if external warehouse confirms another batch number ?

- batch splitting => High level item has already 2 sublines POSNR = 900001 & 900002. Both has batch numbers.

If I want to confirm it, I can send E1EDL19 with BAS qualifier but sublines are added...

Must I delete existing sublines with E1EDL19 DEL ?

Thanks a lot for your help.

J.C.

and to post good issue.

All is OK except

[Former Member]

Hi all,

I would like to use SHPCON.DELVRY03 idoc in order to update Outbound delivery document.

Scope is :

- picking

- good issue

- update batches

- update serial numbers

- update volume and weights

We met issue on update batches a soon as one document item already has batch information before receiving IDoc.

2 cases :

- no batch spliting => High level item has already a linked batch (LIPS-POSNR = 000010 and LIPS-CHARG not empty.

Is there a way to update batch information if external warehouse confirms another batch number ?

- batch splitting => High level item has already 2 sublines POSNR = 900001 & 900002. Both has batch numbers.

If I want to confirm it, I can send E1EDL19 with BAS qualifier but sublines are added...

Must I delete existing sublines with E1EDL19 DEL ?

Thanks a lot for your help.

J.C.

and to post good issue.

All is OK except

[Former Member]

Hi,

We are having same issue as of yours...

i.e Updation of batch via IDOC to the delivery if delivery contains batch ...its not happening and also idoc not throwing any error

Did you able to resolve this ?

Thanks

Rajesh