Idoc help

[Former Member]

Hi guys,

I currently have a program which takes in an input file (text) and then uses the following BAPIs to either change a Purchase Order or to do a Goods Movement:-

BAPI_PO_CHANGE

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE

I know want to change this functionality to use idocs instead,

The input file will remain the same but instead of calling these BAPIs, I want to simulate an inbound idoc coming in.

Can someone please advise whether there are idocs for this and if so, how I go about programatically generating an inbound idoc for these?

Thanks,

Ruby

[Sm1tje]

Beside the usual (inbound) configuration which can best be done via area menu 'WEDI', you can call the 'default' function module for generating IDoc's. I thought it was called something like 'MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE'. By using this, Idoc's will be generated. But you will have to find out which IDoc should be used for this. Do a search in WE30, to find the basic IDoc types for this.

BTW: It is also possible that these function modules are part of the same function group as the above mentioned BAPI's.

Edited by: Micky Oestreich on Feb 25, 2009 1:33 PM

[Former Member]

Thanks,

I have used FM MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE in the past for sending outbound idocs but as this time I want to create an inbound idoc, I wasn't sure if there was a differen FM for this.

I have also found FM IDOC_INPUT. Do you know what this is for?

Thanks,

Ruby

[former_member582701]

Hi,

You have to use FM IDOC_WRITE_AND_START_INBOUND to simulate an inbound idoc.

The steps are:

1- read your .txt file

2- fill the idoc control and the idoc data and to call IDOC_WRITE_AND_START_INBOUND

3- In this point it is like if an idoc is incoming (in fact, you can see it in WE05 transaction) so you have to have parametrized the standard idoc message/type in WE20 transaction

Regards,

Manel

[former_member404244]

Hi,

the basic type for po ->ORDERS05 and for goods movement->MBGMCR03.

u can use the FM'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for Po and 'BAPI_IDOC_INPUT1' for goods movement.

Regards,

Nagaraj

[Former Member]

Closing question