‎2021 Mar 31 12:21 PM
Hi experts!
I want to exclude generated objects (e.g. generated function groups for table maintenance) from the CI Check as they're only producing a large number of messages in the result list but cannot be fixed. I want to exclude them from the checks via a custom check class but I don't know how to identify them.
I already checked this ABAP Test Cockpit - Exemption handling for generated objects | SAP Community from 2013 but the proposed solutions won't help us
- extra package only for generated coding and excluding the package of the ATC Check
- Assemption for every message - which is what we are doing today
We have to deliver a lot of coding to different customer projects as products and we need a solution that just excludes this findings of the ATC Check because this causes a lot of unnecessary effort.
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian
‎2021 Apr 01 3:35 AM
Hi Sebastian
Try implement following notes first:
2689344 - Too many findings for ATC or Code Inspector
2338623 - ATC checks check generated table maintenance function groups
2722349 - ATC checks result in findings for generated code in smartforms
Regards
Tom
‎2021 Apr 01 3:35 AM
Hi Sebastian
Try implement following notes first:
2689344 - Too many findings for ATC or Code Inspector
2338623 - ATC checks check generated table maintenance function groups
2722349 - ATC checks result in findings for generated code in smartforms
Regards
Tom
‎2021 Apr 06 2:20 PM
Hi Tom! Thanks for you answer but the Note cannot be implemented as we are on S4 HANA SAP_BASIS 7.54 and Coding from the notes should have been already in our system. But obviously this didn't help. Is there any other way to prevent the SAP Standard Coding to be checked?
‎2021 Apr 07 1:21 AM
Hi Wilhelm
Normally with the notes I mentioned, the issue should be gone. Have you implemented them in both the check and checked system?
And, try this:
====
When editing the object set at the code inspector go to:
Menu-> Edit -> select "Exclude View Maintenance Function Groups"-> save.
run the check again.
====
Regards
Tom