Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

EC60

Former Member
0 Likes
1,305

Hello,

in transaction EC60 I have many buttons:

1) Move- in

2) Move- out

3) Business Partner (Move- in/out..)

4) premise (Move- in/out..)

I want that user used in buttons:

3) Business Partner (Move- in/out..)

4) premise (Move- in/out..)

and not use button:

1) Move- in

2) Move- out

how can i restrict them?

thanks eran

8 REPLIES 8
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,092

When you ran a trace to identify the objects required, what were the results?

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,092

hello,

the problem is that E_MOVE_OUT was check when i opearte button "Move- out"

and when i opreate the button Business Partner

eran

Read only

0 Likes
1,092

If there is no difference between the authority-checks of the functions, then check with your functional folks whether there is a configuration possibility to disable them selectively in the IMG customzing (tcode SPRO).

If you can read ABAP, then you will often find such customizing dependent check routines immediately ahead of the authority-check statement in the coding. From the ST01 trace, there is an option to navigate to the source code location of the check.

Cheers,

Julius

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,092

hello,

can you give more details how can i disable the buttons.

best regaed

eran

Read only

0 Likes
1,092

I thought I just did...

Perhaps I am the problem?

Read only

0 Likes
1,092

>Perhaps I am the problem?

Yes, Julius : you did not give the "step by step brains off" procedure....

Read only

0 Likes
1,092

Hi Julius,

I too have a similar kind of requirement to disable the buttons move-In and Move-Out. Kindly provide me your views to achieve it. Thanks

Regards,

Lakshmana.P

Read only

0 Likes
1,092

Hi Lakshmana,

It is detailed in Julius' post. Is there something in there that you would like clarification on?