Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Dynamic logo from filesystem in Smartforms

hagit
Active Participant
0 Likes
859

Hello experts,

I have logos in filesystem. When looking at the file the quality of the logo is good.

I uploaded the filesystem to SE78 in order to display the logos in SFP and in Smartforms. Even though the quality in filesystem is good, When running the forms, the quality of the logo is not good enough. In SFP I succeeded to show the logo directly from the file system and it improves the quality. My question is how can I show in Smartforms a dynamic logo from filesystem?

Thanks in advance

Hagit

Hello experts,

I have logos in filesystem. When looking at the file the quality of the logo is good.

I uploaded the filesystem to SE78 in order to display the logos in SFP and in Smartforms. Even though the quality in filesystem is good, When running the forms, the quality of the logo is not good enough. In SFP I succeeded to show the logo directly from the file system and it improves the quality. My question is how can I show in Smartforms a dynamic logo from filesystem?

Thanks in advance

Hagit

2 REPLIES 2
Read only

Sandra_Rossi
Active Contributor
0 Likes
792

Why are you talking about the quality of the image, if the question is only about "dynamic logo from filesystem"?

I remember that there was a blog post about creating a graphic at run time (from any source, filesystem or whatever), so that to be able to include any image in the smart form. Maybe it was about employee photo. Maybe it was using the function module SAPSCRIPT_CONVERT_BITMAP_BDS + the class CL_BDS_DOCUMENT_SET + insert into table STXBITMAPS...

Read only

hagit
Active Participant
0 Likes
792

If I understand you, your suggestion is to upload the image into SAP programmatically instead of using SE78. Am I right? If yes, then it does not solve my problem. I do not have any problem to use SE78. The problem is that when I use SE78 it affects the quality of the image in comparing to the quality when opening the file by images' editor. Or in comparing to the quality in TC SFP when displaying the image directly from filesystem without using SE78.