2009 Apr 06 11:48 AM
Dear people..I'm creating an lsmw for mm01..in tat I select purchasing view n also plant data1 view..both have the field order unit..once u fill in this n press enter you will get a window where you need to fill the numerator & denominator..Say 1 & 5 respectively..now when it comes to plant data1 view again the same fields need to be filled..say 1 & 6 this time.. Numerator field is UMREN & Denominator UMREZ..the same field is there in the other view also..Now in the recording I can see this twice but in field mapping that is the 5th step of lsmw batch input, the fields do not come twice so I'm not able to match it..I also have a doubt if it is possible where for the same material the numerator & denominator changes its values in different views??
Kindly Help..
Thanks & Regards
Ajai
2009 Apr 06 4:19 PM
let us say in the first view the field name is umren and for the second view it is having the same name, then name the field name as umren1.
Dear people..I'm creating an lsmw for mm01..in tat I select purchasing view n also plant data1 view..both have the field order unit..once u fill in this n press enter you will get a window where you need to fill the numerator & denominator..Say 1 & 5 respectively..now when it comes to plant data1 view again the same fields need to be filled..say 1 & 6 this time.. Numerator field is UMREN & Denominator UMREZ..the same field is there in the other view also..Now in the recording I can see this twice but in field mapping that is the 5th step of lsmw batch input, the fields do not come twice so I'm not able to match it..I also have a doubt if it is possible where for the same material the numerator & denominator changes its values in different views??
Kindly Help..
Thanks & Regards
Ajai
2009 Apr 06 4:19 PM
let us say in the first view the field name is umren and for the second view it is having the same name, then name the field name as umren1.
2009 Apr 07 8:05 AM
Dear PBS, What u say is right..I already tried it like that..but this renaming can be done in the source fields step..but still you wont get a those same fields in the field mapping step..that is where the problem is..U dont have tat field to map it with the ones in your source structure..Any possibilities of gettin this resolved??
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |