Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY

prince_isaac
Active Participant
0 Likes
992

hi gurus

after an upgrade the MM guys are trying to do ME41 and they get the DDIC_TYPE_INCONSISTENCY error where structure MC03BF0 is partly active and if i try to activate it i get the error that field ATTYP is specified more than once in the structure.

6 REPLIES 6
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
819

Hi Prince,

If you use SE11 for the structure you should be able to find where ATTYP has been defined. Most probably an append has been created for this structure in the previous release with ATTYP as one of the fields.

Just remove ATTYP from your append and the structure should be activated again.

Regards,

John.

Read only

0 Likes
819

hie John,

The structure MC03BF0 has an include strcture which is activate and includes the field ATTYP also an include structure which also has the field ATTYP again which is active plus the table itself has the field ATTYP however partly-active. do i remove the field ATTYP from the table and leave the structures intact??

Read only

former_member784222
Active Participant
0 Likes
819

Hi,

Please check the runtime object status of the structure

use transaction SE11 ->

goto utilities->runtimeobject->recursive check->

If the log displays any database table that has used this, take that table to SE14. -> EDIT ->

Activate and Adjust database. Make the table runtime consistent and try to do ME41.

Thanks and regards,

S. Chandra Mouli.

Read only

0 Likes
819

hie

i tried the recursive check but only the same structure comes up again and is inconsistencies. going to the database utility the error that the structure MC03BF0 cannot be adjusted is displayed.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
819

try to activate the structure by the transactino SE14.

Bye

enzo

Read only

prince_isaac
Active Participant
0 Likes
819

Deleting the field ATTYP activating and adjusting through SE14 solved my problem.