creating different spool requests based on sorting -part II

[Former Member]

hi folks,

Now I have added the group field to 'accitab' and as mentioned I have another itable (same as 'accitab') called 'final_accitab where I have the recrods for all the customers and their corresponding group types too.

something like this..

customernumber ........ sortgroup

1000001 1

1000001 1

1000001 1

1000012 1

1000012 1

1000112 1

.

.

.

.

10000002 2

10000002 2

10000002 2

.

.

.

.

10000003 3 and so on

Now I have to print the customers based on the sorting therefore I should be passing the records of all the customers that come under a common sort type into one spool request,( I think that way!!) and how to do that ?

ii)how to print separate statements for each customer

for the same sort within the same spool request.

Thanks in advance

Vinu

[Former Member]

Hi Vinu

In first time in which you call SSF_OPEN there shouldn't be any problem, but after you have to recall SSF_OPEN only if you have called SSF_CLOSE before.

So my idea was to use a flag (FL_OPEN) to check it, becouse I had placed the call of SSF_CLOSE before.

LOOP AT .......

IF FL_OPEN = 'X'.

• If in the previous loops SSF_OPEN has been called,

• now it has to close spool

CALL SSF_CLOSE

......

ENDIF.

• After closing previous spool, it open another one:

CALL SSF_OPEN

IF SY-SUBRC = 0.

• Set open flag to can call fm of close in a next loops

FL_OPEN = 'X'.

ENDIF.

Max

[Former Member]

Printer names are case sensitive. Have you checked that?

Srinivas

Message was edited by: Srinivas Adavi

Also, I see that you marked this as answered, but I don't see any points given to Max, who has helped you a lot on this issue. Please reward him for his efforts.

[Former Member]

Yes.

[Former Member]

Hi Vinu

I agree with Srinivas: check the name of device, are you sure it's Xerox1?

You can try to transfer the name of that printer by dialog (FM SSF_OPEN) and then check the name in debug.

Max

[Former Member]

Hi Vinu,

I saw that you rewarded Max for his effort. I apologize for missing it.

Regards,

Srinivas