‎2017 Aug 17 7:40 PM
Hello,
We need to rework the appends/includes developed in our namespace for better transparency and reduce complex development. Is there a way to replace an existing INCLUDE with another name with the same fields?
Any advice is welcomed.
Regards, Dean.
‎2017 Aug 18 1:07 PM
Cant't answer your quest (my guess: yes, should be possible without data loss), but a test scenario with $tmp opjects should be build up in a couple of minutes by yourself.
Would be nice if you could post your test results here.
‎2017 Aug 19 10:56 AM
Hi Uwe, I did the test in 2 minutes and it works without any issue (I modified the include name, whose fields were identical to the original include, and activated it without database utility). Can you convert your comment into an answer so that we can vote for it?
‎2017 Aug 21 12:09 PM
Yes, changing the INCLUDEs name doesn't result in dataloss (see also comments on your original question above)