BOL multiple values search

[Former Member]

Hi Experts!

I have a very simple question. I have a list of partner guids, so how can I process the searching for appropriate business partners' entities via CL_CRM_BOL_DQUERY_SERVICE methods (or something else)? So I just need to make a search for multiple values for one search criterion at the same time (logical OR), how?

Thank you!

Edited by: Mr.Tourette on Jan 12, 2012 8:38 AM

[Former Member]

Hi Experts!

I have a very simple question. I have a list of partner guids, so how can I process the searching for appropriate business partners' entities via CL_CRM_BOL_DQUERY_SERVICE methods (or something else)? So I just need to make a search for multiple values for one search criterion at the same time (logical OR), how?

Thank you!

Edited by: Mr.Tourette on Jan 12, 2012 8:38 AM

[Former Member]

Hi,

If you just want the bol entity of a certain object, you can use following code:

data: lr_core type ref to cl_crm_bol_core.

  lr_core = cl_crm_bol_core=>get_instance( ).

* create root object
    TRY.
        CALL METHOD lr_core->get_root_entity
          EXPORTING
            iv_object_name = 'BuilHeader'
            iv_object_guid = lv_guid
          RECEIVING
            rv_result      = lr_entity.
      CATCH cx_crm_genil_model_error .
        RETURN.
    ENDTRY.

The builheader entity name can be changed to other root enities as well.

Kind regards.

[Former Member]

Yes I know, but I want to get entity collection of several guids. Surely I can make it using loop for each entity, but it seems to be not very optimal in execution time.

Don't you know the way to do it?

[Former Member]

Hi,

Seems like you are right Mr. Tourette.

I've created a small FM to test performance of both methods of working and one BOL query containing all the guids outperforms the GET_ROOT.

Afterwards, this seemed logic to me as well (what was i thinking?!). The BOL query will only use one SQL query, as the GET_ROOT will use multiple.

I will insert the code of my test FM, so you can compare both methods and implement the query.

DATA: lt_guids TYPE TABLE OF crmt_object_guid.
  DATA: lr_core TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_core.
  DATA: lr_col TYPE REF TO if_bol_bo_col.
  DATA: lr_entity TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_entity.
  DATA: lr_qs TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_dquery_service.
  DATA: lv_low TYPE string.
  DATA: lv_start TYPE timestamp.
  DATA: lv_end TYPE timestamp.
  DATA: lv_diff TYPE timestamp.
  FIELD-SYMBOLS: <guid> LIKE LINE OF lt_guids.

*startup
  SELECT partner_guid UP TO 1000 ROWS FROM but000 INTO TABLE lt_guids WHERE name_last LIKE 'A%'.
  lr_core = cl_crm_bol_core=>get_instance( ).
  lr_core->start_up( iv_appl_name = 'ALL' ).


*with get root entity:
  CREATE OBJECT lr_col TYPE cl_crm_bol_bo_col.
if scenario = 1.
  GET TIME STAMP FIELD lv_start.

  LOOP AT lt_guids ASSIGNING <guid>.
    TRY.
        CALL METHOD lr_core->get_root_entity
          EXPORTING
            iv_object_name = 'BuilHeader'
            iv_object_guid = <guid>
          RECEIVING
            rv_result      = lr_entity.
        lr_col->add( lr_entity ).
      CATCH cx_crm_genil_model_error .
        RETURN.
    ENDTRY.
  ENDLOOP.
  GET TIME STAMP FIELD lv_end.

  rv_get_root = lv_end - lv_start.

else.
*search for all entities at once
  lr_qs = cl_crm_bol_dquery_service=>get_instance( iv_query_name = 'BuilHeaderAdvancedSearch' ).
  lr_col->clear( ).

  GET TIME STAMP FIELD lv_start.

  LOOP AT lt_guids ASSIGNING <guid>.
    lv_low = <guid>.
    lr_qs->add_selection_param( iv_attr_name = 'PARTNER_GUID'
    iv_sign = 'I'
    iv_option = 'EQ'
    iv_low = lv_low
      ).
  ENDLOOP.


  lr_col = lr_qs->get_query_result( ).
  GET TIME STAMP FIELD lv_end.

  rv_query = lv_end - lv_start.
endif.

[kesavadas_thekkillath]

Is this anything different from a select from table BUT000 ?

[Former Member]

I don't think you can compare the instantiation of BOL-objects with a simple sql query.

The BOL-objects are going to get a lot more data from multiple tables (so not only BUT000).

Kind regards,

[Former Member]

Thank you very much! Loop method really works fast enough!