Background task

[Former Member]

Hi all,

Can any1 gimme some tips on timeout issues for background tasks

I am calling my FM in background task in VA01 which gets executed if I run the background task in Debug mode but doesnot get executed when i run the background task without debug mode.Could not understand the issue.

Hoping it is a timeout issue.ny suggestions on this..

ani

[Former Member]

Hi

All GUI Function Modules dont run in background mode...

What is the FM you are using?

Regards,

Vishwa.

[Former Member]

Hi,

Usually timeout issues do not affect background jobs. But yes there might be an infinite loop formed and hence the job keeps on executing. One more thing, if a background job is cancelled please check the job log once it will give you the error that has caused the job to stop.

Regards,

Pramod

[Former Member]

hi ,

We also had a same issue. When running in debug mode, it executes perfectly, but when we execute directly , it doesnt work, its a time issue. just increase time . so that it will get time to save data. I hope it will solve your problem.

[Former Member]

Hi Meena,

Can you please temme how do you increase time in technical terms.

Thanks,

ani

[Former Member]

Try this ' wait up to N seconds.' after call FM

[Former Member]

Hi Anil,

Is your problem solved ?

[Former Member]

'Wait upto N seconds' is wrkin n gud but i cant use due to some performance issues..

Plz suggest me somethin else..

Thnx,ani

[former_member182354]

If you use call screen statement then it may take loong time to run..

Raghav

[Former Member]

Hi Anil,

Please check below link for more details on how to resolve this issue. I hope it will be useful.

Thanks and Best Regards,

Dinesh.

[Former Member]

Hi Anil

If you use any FM which get confirmation from user (ie, YES / NO) and if the default value you've set is NO then it will not run in back ground (probably while debugging you might've answered YES).

For increasing the time, transaction RZ11 can used for which you can contact your BASIS team .

Regards

Prabumanoharan

[Former Member]

alternative soln needed