‎2009 Jan 13 8:59 AM
Hello,
we have a problem in our luw! Although we do not use an explicit 'commit work' in one of our dialog-programs, a 'rollback' does not work correctly. I have tried to trace the sql-units while execution the program and find out that there are a whole of commit works in the trace-protocoll.
It looks like:
09:44:21.423 105 SAPLSEUJ PROGDIR EXECSTM 119 1 1 0 R/3 1 UPDATE SET "RSTAT" = 'S' , "UNAM" =
09:44:21.423 944 SAPLSYDB EXECSTA 0 0 R/3 1 COMMIT WORK
09:44:21.426 267 SAPLSYDB EXECSTA 0 0 R/3 1 COMMIT WORK
Is there any chance to avoid such implicit commit-works?
Greetings,
Marcel
‎2009 Jan 13 9:32 AM
Some ABAP keywords have implicit commits. nothing can be done about them. For statements which requires explicit commits we can use the ROLLBACK WORK statement.
‎2009 Jan 13 9:27 AM
‎2009 Jan 13 9:32 AM
Some ABAP keywords have implicit commits. nothing can be done about them. For statements which requires explicit commits we can use the ROLLBACK WORK statement.
‎2009 Jan 13 12:02 PM