ALV Grid Back ground Execution Problem

[former_member4907]

Hi Firends,

If i run my ALV Grid Report in background, i am getting X instead of the last digit in the external number . All other fields are coming correctly.

Ex..Customer number is 90000036..in output i am getting 9000003X.

<removed by moderator>

Thanks,

Murali K

Message was edited by: Thomas Zloch

[avik_ghosh]

Hi Murali,

Why don't you create the structure of the internal table in SE11 which you are passing for display.

Regards,

Avik

[former_member4907]

Hi Avik,

Thanks for the reply.

I hope it is not a good idea to create a new structure , just for ALV Grid download Purpose.

I don't think, it is the cause the problem.

Thanks,

Murali K

[RaymondGiuseppi]

Once you are confident with your field catalog (The Consistency Check) check your report width (REPORT LINE-SIZE width) as well as the layout and line size of the generated spool (Print parameters).

Regards,

Raymond

[Former Member]

Hi

Increase the output length of KUNNR in the fieldcatalog and try...

Regards

[former_member4907]

Hi,

My Field is in the Middle of the Report. I am getting all the values correctly in Foreground.

Thanks,

Murali K

[ankurgodre]

Hello Kakarla,

This generally happens due to less report line size or incorrect print parameters settings.

>Try checking the field length of the field defined in the internal table which is getting the value 'X'.

> You may increase the LINE-SIZE in the Report statement to see if the value come properly.

> Also, you may set the print parameters to accommodate your output in spool settings.

Hope any or all options resolve your issue.

BR

Ankur

[former_member4907]

Hi Ankur,

i tried the same but no use.

You Can see from the below output , my field is 2nd one.

Spool i can see X, if copy the same and paste, even X is missing.( Paste in word or excel)

1101      7051582X  OLTP_20111226_000313612 12/26/2011 P11RFCUSR  01/01/2010        12/31/2010      KMT           P11RFCUSR  01/01/2010      12/31/2010

Thanks,

Murali

[Former Member]

Hi

Try using Conversion routines....

CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_OUTPUT

Regards

[RaymondGiuseppi]

This may be a column width size (caused or not by a report/print width too small), try as already previously suggested to increase report and print width, you could also use an ALV variant with enouth width for the column or use colwidth_optimize in the layout.

Regards,

Raymond

[ankurgodre]

Hello Kakarla,

Try the following:

GO to Transaction code SPAD >> Go to the Menu item Settings -> Spool System >> go to the tab OTHER >> Click on the First check box & SAVE it as below:

Also, you may try increasing the No. of COLUMN/ROWS in Spool Administration: Format Type to see if it works.

BR

Ankur

[former_member4907]

Hi Ankur,

I tried the same but no luck.

Thanks,

Murali

[former_member4907]

Hi ,

One more thing, just now i tired in my Colleague system..He is getting 2 dots .. instead of X.

Thanks,

Murali K

[Former Member]

Hi Kakarla,

Why don't you post a screenshot of the spool to give us some idea of how it is displaying?

Did you try the consistency check to make sure no error/warning messages are displayed?

Regards,

Karthik Dharmarajan

[former_member4907]

Hi,

How to do consistency Check.

Thanks,
Murali K

[Former Member]

Hi Kakarla,

Try the below link;

http://scn.sap.com/community/abap/blog/2009/09/25/sos--my-alv-report-is-not-working

Regards,

Karthik Dharmarajan

[former_member4907]

Hi,

Screen shot is here

[Former Member]

Debug the background job using JDBG in SM37 and by setting the external debugger in report or check the settings of spool.

[former_member4907]

Hi,

Consistency Check is Good..No Errors.

Thanks,

Murali K

[Former Member]

Hi

Customer number in foreground is displayed as '0090003636' and in background as '90003636x'.

no leading zeroes.

Y don't u try using suppress leading ZEROS in fieldcatalog or conversion routines....?????

Regards

[former_member4907]

Hi Vamshi,

As i know conversion routines to suppress / show zeros. But i am getting 9000363x.

Here x is coming instead of 6.

Thanks,

Murali K