Application Development and Automation Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Add fields on eban

Former Member
0 Likes
2,832

Dear experts ,

We are required to add three fields in EBAN table as customer fields.

We included them in data element CI_EBANDB which is include for

customer fields.

CI_EBANDB is listed now as

ZZISM01

ZZILE01

ZZERSDA

When i see EBAN using se11 i see

EBAN

...

...

..

.. List of EBAN fields

Include CI_EBANDB

ZZISM01

ZZILE01

ZZERSDA

Now i try activating EBAN and it gets active with lots of warning.

I see active status of EBAN but when i double click on CI_EBANDB ,i see status partly active.

I try to reactivate it and the errors on activating CI_EBANDB is

(1)TABLE VSEBAN_CN is inconsistent in active version

(2)Structure change at field level (convert table VSEBAN_CN)

i see this transparent table VSEBAN_CN in SE11 and i find

VSEBAN_CN

.

..

..

..List of EBAN table

..

Include CI_EBANDB

ISM01

ILE01

ERSDA

I double click on CI_EBANDB and find the list as

ZZISM01

ZZILE01

ZZERSDA

Is this the inconsistency error ie letter Z and letter Zs missing

I am not able to get the reason

why this table has come into picture while i made no changes to it ?.

Finally i couldnot rectify the bug

4 REPLIES 4
Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,930

Hello

When you adding fields into EBAN with structure CI_EBANDB this structure automatically adding into table VSEBAN_CN also. For correct work you need reactivate:

CI_EBANDB

VSEBAN_CN

EBAN

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,930

I did that but gone in vain so finally i used SE14 and pressed 'change database' button with save option active

Read only

0 Likes
1,930

Hi,

I think the problem is with the data type you are refering to while declaring the include fields, Make shure that the data type you are refering the ZZ fields to must be a field type.

For example

zdata type pernr , is wrong way to declare since pernr is itself a structure with many components.

zdata type P_PERNR would be correct way of declaration.

Hope this helps you,

Murthy.

Read only

Former Member
0 Likes
1,930

aaa