Batch specific unit of measure in process order

[tor_holter]

Hello,

I have a BOM with a component with active ingredient.

Batches are classified and transaction MMBE shown stock correctly in both units.

But when creating the process order I get two items with same item numer in the material list.

One for batch specifiv unit of measure which is fine.

I also get another line in the base unit of measure.

In table RESB both records have movement allowed so they show up in MIGO.

This increases the total requirements for the component.

What is happening??

Best regards,

TOr

[tor_holter]

New glasses for me.

My mistake and sorry for wasting your time.

It was the validity dates for BOM changes messing things up for me.

[dhaval_choksi3]

Hi,

Do below checks,

1) Item is included in the BOM once or not.I think may be Item is included twice over here with 2 different units

2) May be some one has mad change manually.So check it by creating fresh new order.

Regards,

Dhaval

[tor_holter]

The item is in the BOM only once.

And it is there in the proportion unit.

Mystery to me why I get two lines in process order!?!?!?

This ECC 6.0 level 15.

Regards,

Tor

[Former Member]

could you explain the How it is mapped?

Usually

The header material is assigned with proportion unit with a link to the Batch characteristc.

So when we maintian in the BOM, we always ,maintain in Base UOM and since it change with the Batch characteristic value, it makes sense to maintain it with Base UOm alone

regards

Ratan

Edited by: Ratan on Jul 8, 2009 7:51 PM

[tor_holter]

Thanks for caring!

As for transaction MMBE it all looks fine. So basic definitions must be OK up to that point.

I think the point is to set requirement for the amount of active ingredient.

Do the batch determination for this.

Do the goods issue in physcial quantity which is the base unit of measure.

I did try now with KG in the BOM. I still get double items in the process order. Now both in KG.

One line is correclty copied.

The incorrect line which is the same in both cases says 1 KG. which is the correct conversion from 0,01KAI.

Regards,

Tor