Team, We have a requirement to write a APO DP Macro to satisfy below condition, Consider Key Figures in the planning book, as below,
The macro should first identify the period upto which KF I is present (in the above case Period 6) and then Rele...
Hi AllWe have to identify list of materials which have more than 1 PDS in APO. Can you let me know how we can get this.Few materials have more than 1 PDS with the same priority. Hence priority can be used for this extraction as a criteria.
We are running bottom up heuristics after the PP DS heuristics to reschedule orders based on priorities. The priorities defined are Requirement Date/time and Order Priority. The issue happens that though there are available capacity and material for ...
Hi All,We use Back order processing to change the ATP commitments on a daily basis. The BOP job runs overnight.I find the below issue. There is a material A which has a dependent demand as on Jan 10 2017. This dependent demand is consuming the stock....
Hi All,
We run BOP as background job daily in SCM system. Some sales orders are not getting picked up in the BOP job for some reason. There is pattern in this and we are not able to say why only few sales orders are not getting picked up in the BOP...
Hi Alok,I could not get the number of application server data in Rz12. I get the following details :Activated (0 or 1) 1Max. Requests in Queue (%) 25Max. No. of Logons (%) 90Maximum No. Separate Logons(%) 50Max. Number of WPs ...
Hi Alok,Thank you for your response. Could you please let me know where in the system can i go and check this. Which tcode ?I get the name of the server group in the parallel processing profile. But not sure where i should go and check.Thnak you
Hi Abhijit,I am also facing the same issue. Could you please let me know what was wrong on the ATP type which you changed after which the issue got resolved.My problem is even when the component quantity is being used for some other order, still in R...
I agree with your explanation. ZAEHL is indeed the total number of alternatives created or deleted. So when alternative 5 is present and visible in MAPL, does it not that field ZAEHL should be 5.
