on 2004 Mar 31 9:51 AM
We are running an implementation KM (EP5 SP5) and have several CM repositories. I am attempting to write a document to define when and where each (DB, DBFS & FSDB) CM repository type should be used.
The only reasons I can see for using a DB repository is if there will be a lot of writes and if the files shouldn't be stored externally.
Are there any other reasons to use a DB repository?
Is there a SAP recommended "default" repository type (ie, "use FSDB unless there are reasons not to")?
Cheers.
Stuart -
There are general recommendations in the EP 50 help files.
Admin Guide -> KM Platform -> Administering Content Management -> Configuration of Content Management -> Repositories and Repository Managers -> Internal Repositories -> CM Repository Manager -> Persistence Mode
Regards,
Kyle Lawrence
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, I did check that. It gives recommendation on based on a few factors but what I am asking is, in those occasions where those factors are of no relevance, which repository should be chosen (i.e. is there a SAP recommended default)?
[The 3 replies due to a repeated Java error in the portal!]
In general, the dbfs mode should be <b>avoided</b>, as it has less features, and may not work reliably when the filesystem is indeed manipulated directly.
Julian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
70 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.