on 09-20-2012 11:21 AM
Hi All
We have a difficult scenario in WIP Calculation for Production orders.
Say We create production orders which are planned in APO then transferred to ECC. Now Say Material 30050 we created prod orders for 500 Qty.
Now this Material 30050 is marked as Co Product with Equivalence no.1 because there are different requirements for the material 30050 .
Now this Production order say no Ord no - 100123, for material 30050 for 500 Qty will have 3 different line item for Co products for same material 30050.
Order item Material Qty.
1 30050 100
2 30050 150
3 30050 250
Now since we maintain equilance no 1 for Material 30050, and lets say there is Goods issue to the extent of 100000$ for the order are no GR. so when i run CO8B (Settlement for Co Prds) system split the 100000 equally not based on the weight and Pass WIP entry in KKAX for 3 Orders item at 33333 Each item.
Now if we make GR for order item 3 which is for 250 Qty, then WIP only for the 3rd item is reversed to the extent 33333, but actually it should be based on the Qty.
Now pls let me know what needs to be done so orders item are settled based on Qty not equally based on Equilance no.
Regds
Aravind
Hi
Based on further analysis, i have observed that if we maintain settlement rule - eqvilance no based on the Order qty for the multiple item then WIP is calculated and settled accordingly. So it is not manually feasible to input equivalence no is the settlement rule in orders, because 100s of orders are created from APO and processed in ECC.
Any exits / config available to generate settlement rule based on order item qty.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Alexy
I have used negative wip calculation in my WIP profile to calculagte negative WIP for the co product and settle it to the order main item or vice versa along with set rule pp6.
It solved.
I am not able to recollect the difference between pp5 and pp6 it was in 2012 i guess. So you can try which one suits your requirement.
Regards
Aravind
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.